Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neville, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neville, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, D. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex 1992; 2:244-258
© Oxford University Press 1992


research-article

Fractionating Language: Different Neural Subsystems with Different Sensitive Periods

Helen J. Neville1, Debra L. Mills1 and Donald S. Lawson2

1The Salk Institute La Jolla, California 92186, 2Biomagnetic Technologies San Diego, California 92121

Theoretical considerations and psycholinguistic studies have alternately provided criticism and support for the proposal that semantic and grammatical functions are distinct subprocesses within the language domain. Neurobiological evidence concerning this hypothesis was sought by (1) comparing, in normal adults, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by words that provide primarily semantic information (open class) and grammatical information (closed class) and (2) comparing the effects of the altered early language experience of congenitaily deaf subjects on ERPs to open and closed class words. In normal-hearing adults, the different word types elicited qualitatively different ERPs that were compatible with the hypothesized different roles of the word classes in language processing. In addition, where as ERP indices of semantic processing were virtually identical in deaf and hearing subjects, those linked to grammatical processes were markedly different in deaf and hearing subjects. The results suggest that nonidentical neural systems with different developmental vulnerabilities mediate these different aspects of language. More generally, these results provide neurobiological support for the distinction between semantic and gram-matical functions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
R. Campbell, M. MacSweeney, and D. Waters
Sign Language and the Brain: A Review
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2008; 13(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
L. Pylkkanen and B. McElree
An MEG Study of Silent Meaning.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2007; 19(11): 1905 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
P. J. Holcomb and J. Grainger
On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition Priming.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2006; 18(10): 1631 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
F. Pulvermuller and O. Hauk
Category-specific Conceptual Processing of Color and Form in Left Fronto-temporal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2006; 16(8): 1193 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. I. Knudsen, J. J. Heckman, J. L. Cameron, and J. P. Shonkoff
Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America's future workforce
PNAS, July 5, 2006; 103(27): 10155 - 10162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. Carreiras, M. Vergara, and H. Barber
Early Event-related Potential Effects of Syllabic Processing during Visual Word Recognition
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2005; 17(11): 1803 - 1817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
J. L. Mueller
Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing
Second Language Research, April 1, 2005; 21(2): 152 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. C.M. Bastiaansen, M. van der Linden, M. ter Keurs, T. Dijkstra, and P. Hagoort
Theta Responses Are Involved in Lexical-Semantic Retrieval during Language Processing
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2005; 17(3): 530 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
E. I. Knudsen
Sensitive Periods in the Development of the Brain and Behavior
J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2004; 16(8): 1412 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. A. Sabbagh, M. C. Moulson, and K. L. Harkness
Neural Correlates of Mental State Decoding in Human Adults: An Event-Related Potential Study
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2004; 16(3): 415 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. B. Pulsifer, C. F. Salorio, and J. K. Niparko
Developmental, Audiological, and Speech Perception Functioning in Children After Cochlear Implant Surgery
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2003; 157(6): 552 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. L. Kellenbach, A. A. Wijers, M. Hovius, J. Mulder, and G. Mulder
Neural Differentiation of Lexico-Syntactic Categories or Semantic Features?: Event-Related Potential Evidence for Both
J. Cogn. Neurosci., May 1, 2002; 14(4): 561 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
S. S. Hehar, T. P. Nikolopoulos, K. P. Gibbin, and G. M. O'Donoghue
Surgery and Functional Outcomes in Deaf Children Receiving Cochlear Implants Before Age 2 Years
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, January 1, 2002; 128(1): 11 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. D. Friederici, K. Steinhauer, and E. Pfeifer
Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis
PNAS, January 1, 2002; (2002) 12611199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Levanen, K. Uutela, S. Salenius, and R. Hari
Cortical Representation of Sign Language: Comparison of Deaf Signers and Hearing Non-signers
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2001; 11(6): 506 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. D. Friederici, B. Opitz, and D. Y. von Cramon
Segregating Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Processing in the Human Brain: an fMRI Investigation of Different Word Types
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2000; 10(7): 698 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
F. Pulvermuller, W. Lutzenberger, and H. Preissl
Nouns and Verbs in the Intact Brain: Evidence from Event-related Potentials and High-frequency Cortical Responses
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 1999; 9(5): 497 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
C. M. Brown, P. Hagoort, and M. t. Keurs
Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open- and Closed-Class Words
J. Cogn. Neurosci., May 1, 1999; 11(3): 261 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. ter Keurs, C. M. Brown, P. Hagoort, and D. F. Stegeman
Electrophysiological manifestations of open- and closed-class words in patients with Broca's aphasia with agrammatic comprehension: An event-related brain potential study
Brain, May 1, 1999; 122(5): 839 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
A. Hahne and A. D. Friederici
Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 1999; 11(2): 194 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
A. D. Friederici, H. Schriefers, and U. Lindenberger
Differential Age Effects on Semantic and Syntactic Priming
International Journal of Behavioral Development, December 1, 1998; 22(4): 813 - 845.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. J. Neville, D. Bavelier, D. Corina, J. Rauschecker, A. Karni, A. Lalwani, A. Braun, V. Clark, P. Jezzard, and R. Turner
Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: Biological constraints and effects of experience
PNAS, February 3, 1998; 95(3): 922 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. D. Friederici, K. Steinhauer, and E. Pfeifer
From the Cover: Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis
PNAS, January 8, 2002; 99(1): 529 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.