Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex 1992; 2:134-140
© Oxford University Press 1992


research-article

Effects of Continuous Noise Maskers on Tone-evoked Potentials in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex

Dennis P. Phillips1 and Jack B. Kelly2

1Departments of Psychology and Otolaryngology, Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4J1, 2Department of Psychology, Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6

In nine barbiturate-anesthetized cats, cortical evoked potentials for tones presented to the contralateral ear were studied for the effects of continuous wideband noise masking. In five animals, input-output functions for tones were obtained in the presence of continuous noise masking at the same ear. Tone thresholds were raised by the presence of the masker, and they closely tracked the level of the masker, such that increments in masker level brought about tone threshold elevations of the same magnitude. In four animals, we compared the effect on responses to contralateral tones of continuous maskers presented to the same ear as the tone, to the opposite ear, and to both ears simultaneously. The presence of the masker at the ear opposite the tone had a small and variable effect on the response to the stimulus at the ear with the tone, whether or not noise was also present at that ear. Consideration of extant single-neuron evidence provides an interpretation of these findings. Whereas maskers at the ear with the tone are known to reduce signal sensitivity for almost all cortical neurons, the effects of masking at the ear opposite the tone (ipsilateral to the cortex) are likely to be very heterogeneous. It is likely that the perceptual salience of signals that have different binaural configurations to concurrent maskers resides in which neuronal elements are activated, rather than in the total number of cells excited, and it is perhaps for this reason that the evoked potentials show only modest effects of this masking parameter.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.