Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sergent, J.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sergent, J.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex 1992; 2:68-80
© Oxford University Press 1992


research-article

Positron Emission Tomography Study of Letter and Object Processing: Empirical Findings and Methodological Considerations

Justine Sergent1, Eric Zuck1, Michel Lévesque2 and Brennan MacDonald1

1Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada, 2UCLA School of Medicine Los Angeles, California 90024

The study of functional-anatomical correlations of higher-order cognitive processing has benefited from recent advances in brain imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) measurements of regional cerebral blood flow (CBF). Comparisons of CBF changes by paired image subtraction provide the opportunity to isolate cerebral areas participating in the realization of the processes that differentiate two tasks. However, the subtraction method is based on assumptions that are not entirely compatible with cerebral cognitive processing, and the derived pattern of activation specifically associated with the processes that differentiate two tasks is relative to the activation associated with the subtracted task and may therefore vary as a function of the processes actually performed in this subtracted task. To examine the implications of this procedure, a PET study with the 15O water bolus technique was carried out on normal adults. Subjects performed three tasks that made nonoverlapping cognitive processing demands: a semantic categorization of visual objects, a spatial discrimination of visually presented letters, and a phonological decision on visually presented single letters. Each task produced distinct patterns of activation consistent with evidence from neurological patients, specifically in the left occipital cortex in the semantic categorization of objects, in the parietal cortex of both hemispheres in the letter-spatial task, and in the left frontal and superior temporal cortex in the letter-sound task. However, the comparisons between the two letter tasks did not result in the expected CBF changes even though these two tasks make distinct processing requirements and are dissociable by brain injury. In addition, the phonological task resulted in activation of areas of the frontal cortex that earlier PET studies had identified as participating in semantic operations, whereas letters have no semantic property. These results suggest that the interpretation of patterns of activation is confronted with difficulties due to the automatic, and uncontrolled, processing of verbal stimuli that raises the threshold for significant CBF changes between two conditions that use the same stimuli but different task demands.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. F. Mason and C. N. Macrae
Categorizing and Individuating Others: The Neural Substrates of Person Perception
J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2004; 16(10): 1785 - 1795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
T M Rushe, C M Temple, L Rifkin, P W R Woodruff, E T Bullmore, A L Stewart, A Simmons, T A Russell, and R M Murray
Lateralisation of language function in young adults born very preterm
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2004; 89(2): F112 - F118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
K. Mathiak, I. Hertrich, W. Grodd, and H. Ackermann
Cerebellum and Speech Perception: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2002; 14(6): 902 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Habib
The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: An overview and working hypothesis
Brain, December 1, 2000; 123(12): 2373 - 2399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. W. Burton, S. L. Small, and S. E. Blumstein
The Role of Segmentation in Phonological Processing: An fMRI Investigation
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2000; 12(4): 679 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M.-A. Tagamets, J. M. Novick, M. L. Chalmers, and R. B. Friedman
A Parametric Approach to Orthographic Processing in the Brain: An fMRI Study
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2000; 12(2): 281 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
G. R. Kuperberg, P. K. McGuire, E. T. Bullmore, M. J. Brammer, S. Rabe-Hesketh, I. C. Wright, D. J. Lythgoe, S. C. R. Williams, and A. S. David
Common and Distinct Neural Substrates for Pragmatic, Semantic, and Syntactic Processing of Spoken Sentences: An fMRI Study
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2000; 12(2): 321 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
R. Cabeza and L. Nyberg
Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies
J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 12(1): 1 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. A. Springer, J. R. Binder, T. A. Hammeke, S. J. Swanson, J. A. Frost, P. S. F. Bellgowan, C. C. Brewer, H. M. Perry, G. L. Morris, and W. M. Mueller
Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: A functional MRI study
Brain, November 1, 1999; 122(11): 2033 - 2046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
P. Hagoort, C. Brown, P. Indefrey, H. Herzog, H. Steinmetz, and R. J. Seitz
The Neural Circuitry Involved in the Reading of German Words and Pseudowords: A PET Study
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 1999; 11(4): 383 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. Raij
Patterns of Brain Activity during Visual Imagery of Letters
J. Cogn. Neurosci., May 1, 1999; 11(3): 282 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. J. Grabowski and A. R. Damasio
Improving functional imaging techniques: The dream of a single image for a single mental event
PNAS, December 10, 1996; 93(25): 14302 - 14303.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
B. A. Shaywitz, S. E. Shaywitz, K. R. Pugh, P. Skudlarski, R. K. Fulbright, R.T. Constable, J. M. Fletcher, A. M. Liberman, D. P. Shankweiler, L. Katz, et al.
The Functional Organization of Brain for Reading and Reading Disability (Dyslexia
Neuroscientist, July 1, 1996; 2(4): 245 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
G. McCarthy
Review : Functional Neuroimaging of Memory
Neuroscientist, May 1, 1995; 1(3): 155 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J Sergent, E Zuck, S Terriah, and B MacDonald
Distributed neural network underlying musical sight-reading and keyboard performance
Science, July 3, 1992; 257(5066): 106 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.