Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2008
Cerebral Cortex 2009 19(4):916-925; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn140
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/916    most recent
bhn140v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vickery, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, Y. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vickery, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, Y. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Inferior Parietal Lobule Supports Decision Making under Uncertainty in Humans

Timothy J. Vickery1 and Yuhong V. Jiang1,2

1 Harvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2 University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology & Center for Cognitive Sciences, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Address correspondence to Timothy J. Vickery, Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Ave., New Haven, CT 06520, USA. Email: tim.vickery{at}gmail.com.

The optimal responses for many decisions faced by humans are ill defined, yet we are able to choose well by associating choices with outcomes, and employing this information in decision making. Previous studies suggest that the parietal cortex is involved in "uncertain" decision making, yet uncertainty is confounded with increased difficulty and attention. Here we aim to dissociate the role of parietal cortex in decision making and attention. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging we measured brain activity while participants played a "matching-pennies" game. We found that the inferior parietal lobule is involved in decision making under uncertainty, showing higher activity when the decision was uncertain rather than certain and when humans were given trial-by-trial feedback on choice outcomes than when they were not. Crucially, increasing attentional load with secondary tasks reduced inferior parietal activity when decisions were made under uncertainty, suggesting that general attention does not drive its activation. This pattern was consistent for visual or auditory feedback, and for direct (symbols representing wins and losses) or indirect (only the opponent's choices were shown) feedback. It contrasted with results from medial superior frontal gyrus, which was driven primarily by increased attentional load. We suggest that decision making under uncertainty is dissociable from general attention in the brain.

Key Words: attention • decision making • inferior parietal lobule • reward


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. P. Prata, A. Mechelli, C. H. Y. Fu, M. Picchioni, T. Toulopoulou, E. Bramon, M. Walshe, R. M. Murray, D. A. Collier, and P. McGuire
Epistasis between the DAT 3' UTR VNTR and the COMT Val158Met SNP on cortical function in healthy subjects and patients with schizophrenia
PNAS, August 11, 2009; 106(32): 13600 - 13605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. S. Simons, P. V. Peers, Y. S. Mazuz, M. E. Berryhill, and I. R. Olson
Dissociation Between Memory Accuracy and Memory Confidence Following Bilateral Parietal Lesions
Cereb Cortex, June 19, 2009; (2009) bhp116v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Seo, D. J. Barraclough, and D. Lee
Lateral Intraparietal Cortex and Reinforcement Learning during a Mixed-Strategy Game
J. Neurosci., June 3, 2009; 29(22): 7278 - 7289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.