Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2007
Cerebral Cortex 2008 18(8):1951-1960; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm222
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/8/1951    most recent
bhm222v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makarov, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Innocenti, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makarov, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Innocenti, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Stimulus-Dependent Interaction between the Visual Areas 17 and 18 of the 2 Hemispheres of the Ferret (Mustela putorius)

Valeri A. Makarov1, Kerstin E. Schmidt2, Nazareth P. Castellanos1, Laura Lopez-Aguado1 and Giorgio M. Innocenti3

1 Department of Applied Mathematics, School of Optics, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28037 Madrid, Spain, 2 Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany, 3 Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, S17177 Stockholm, Sweden

Address correspondence to Prof. Giorgio M. Innocenti, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Retzius väg 8, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden. Email Giorgio.Innocenti{at}ki.se.

To study how the visual areas of the 2 hemispheres interact in processing visual stimuli we have recorded local field potentials in the callosally connected parts of areas 17 and 18 of the ferret during the presentation of 3 kinds of stimuli: 2.5° squares flashed for 50 ms randomly in the visual field (S1), 4 full-field gratings differing in orientation by 45° and identical in the 2 hemifields (S2) and gratings as above but whose orientation and/or direction of motion differed by 90° in the 2 hemifields (S3). The gratings remained stationary for 0.5 s and then moved in 1 of the 2 directions perpendicular to their orientation for 3 s. We compared the responses in baseline conditions with those obtained whereas the contralateral visual areas were inactivated by cooling. Cooling did not affect the responses to S1 but it modified those to S2 and to S3 generally increasing early components of the response while decreasing later components. These findings indicate that interhemispheric processing is restricted to visual stimuli which achieve spatial summation and that it involves complex inhibitory and facilitatory effects, possibly carried out by interhemispheric pathways of different conduction velocity.

Key Words: cooling • corpus callosum • ferret • interhemispheric interactions • visual cortex


Valeri A. Makarov and Kerstin E. Schmidt contributed equally to this work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Kaschube, M. Schnabel, F. Wolf, and S. Lowel
Interareal coordination of columnar architectures during visual cortical development
PNAS, October 6, 2009; 106(40): 17205 - 17210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
N. L. Rochefort, P. Buzas, N. Quenech'du, A. Koza, U. T. Eysel, C. Milleret, and Z. F. Kisvarday
Functional Selectivity of Interhemispheric Connections in Cat Visual Cortex
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2009; 19(10): 2451 - 2465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.