Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on July 5, 2007
Cerebral Cortex 2008 18(3):683-696; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm104
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
18/3/683    most recent
bhm104v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A. C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A. C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Activating the Medial Temporal Lobe during Oddity Judgment for Faces and Scenes

Andy C. H. Lee1,2, Victoria L. Scahill2 and Kim S. Graham2,3

1 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK, 2 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK, 3 Wales Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK

Address correspondence to email: andy.lee{at}psy.ox.ac.uk.

Impairments in visual discrimination beyond long-term declarative memory have been found in amnesic individuals, with hippocampal lesions resulting in deficits in scene discrimination and perirhinal cortex damage affecting object discrimination. To complement these findings, the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study found that in healthy participants oddity judgment for novel trial-unique scenes, compared with face or size oddity, was associated with increased posterior hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex activity. In contrast, perirhinal and anterior hippocampus activity was observed during unfamiliar trial-unique face oddity judgment, when contrasted with scene or size oddity tasks. Activity in all of these regions decreased as the stimuli were repeated across trials, reflecting the participants' increasing familiarity with the stimuli. This change was significant in all areas, with the exception of the perirhinal cortex, right anterior hippocampus, and to a lesser extent the left anterior hippocampus during face oddity judgment. One possibility is that the activity in these regions may not reflect entirely episodic memory encoding but, in part, processes beyond the mnemonic domain. Thus, the perirhinal cortex, and possibly anterior hippocampus, may play a more generic role in the discrimination and processing of objects.

Key Words: hippocampus • memory • perception • perirhinal cortex • visual discrimination


Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Medical Research Council, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. B. O'Neil, A. D. Cate, and S. Kohler
Perirhinal Cortex Contributes to Accuracy in Recognition Memory and Perceptual Discriminations
J. Neurosci., July 1, 2009; 29(26): 8329 - 8334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. S. Holdstock, J. Hocking, P. Notley, J. T. Devlin, and C. J. Price
Integrating Visual and Tactile Information in the Perirhinal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, April 22, 2009; (2009) bhp073v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.