Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on May 17, 2006
Cerebral Cortex 2007 17(4):859-864; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk039
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frontal–Temporal Disconnection Abolishes Object Discrimination Learning Set in Macaque Monkeys
1 Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK, 2 Department of Psychology, University of Durham, Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
Address correspondence to Philip G.F. Browning, Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK. Email: philip.browning{at}psy.ox.ac.uk.
Two previous studies have shown that frontal–temporal disconnection in monkeys, produced by unilateral ablation of frontal cortex in one hemisphere and of visual inferior temporal cortex in the opposite hemisphere is entirely without effect on visual object–reward association learning in concurrent discrimination tasks. This is a surprising finding in light of the severe impairments that follow frontal–temporal disconnection in many other tests of visual learning and memory, including delayed matching-to-sample and several conditional learning tasks. To explore the limits of this preserved object-reward association learning, we trained monkeys on visual object discrimination learning set (DLS) prior to frontal–temporal disconnection. As a result of training with single object–reward associations, the monkeys acquired a proficient learning set, evidenced by the rapid learning of new single object–reward association problems. This rapid learning was not affected by unilateral ablations of either inferior temporal cortex alone or frontal cortex alone but was severely impaired after final surgery to complete the disconnection. Moreover, each individual monkey now learned single object–reward association problems at the slow rate at which that individual had learned such problems before the formation of learning set. This result shows that frontal–temporal disconnection abolishes visual learning set.
Key Words: discrimination learning • inferior temporal cortex • frontal cortex • macaque • memory
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Sigala, M. Kusunoki, I. Nimmo-Smith, D. Gaffan, and J. Duncan Hierarchical coding for sequential task events in the monkey prefrontal cortex PNAS, August 19, 2008; 105(33): 11969 - 11974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. H. Rudebeck and E. A. Murray Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Cortex Lesions Differentially Influence Choices during Object Reversal Learning J. Neurosci., August 13, 2008; 28(33): 8338 - 8343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. R. E. Wilson and D. Gaffan Prefrontal-Inferotemporal Interaction Is Not Always Necessary for Reversal Learning J. Neurosci., May 21, 2008; 28(21): 5529 - 5538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. G. F. Browning and D. Gaffan Prefrontal Cortex Function in the Representation of Temporally Complex Events J. Neurosci., April 9, 2008; 28(15): 3934 - 3940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Izquierdo, T. K. Newman, J. D. Higley, and E. A. Murray Genetic modulation of cognitive flexibility and socioemotional behavior in rhesus monkeys PNAS, August 28, 2007; 104(35): 14128 - 14133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|