Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on March 24, 2006
Cerebral Cortex 2007 17(2):466-474; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj163
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in the Foreperiod Effect: TMS Evidence for Dual Mechanisms in Temporal Preparation
1 Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, Schola Internationale Superiore di Studi Avanzati–International School for Advanced Studies, Trieste, Italy, 2 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College of London, London, UK, 3 Department of Psychology, University College of London, London, UK
Address correspondence to Antonino Vallesi, Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, SISSA–International School for Advanced Studies, via Beirut 2-4, 34014 Trieste, Italy. Email: vallesi{at}sissa.it.
The involvement of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) in explicit temporal processing is well documented. Conversely, the role of this area in implicit temporal processing (e.g., foreperiod [FP] effect) is still poorly understood. The FP effect, usually observed when a range of variable FPs occur randomly and equiprobably, consists of reaction times (RTs) decreasing as the FP increases. Moreover, in such paradigms, RTs increase as a function of the preceding FP (i.e., sequential effects). Patients with lesions of the rDLPFC do not show the typical FP effect. The present study aimed to replicate these results in healthy adults using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and to further investigate whether any change of sequential effects follows a reduction of the FP effect. The results of 2 experiments (with simple and choice RT tasks, respectively) indicate that the FP effect was significantly reduced after TMS over the rDLPFC, whereas no effect was observed after stimulation of a left contralateral site and the right angular gyrus. Conversely, sequential effects were not influenced by TMS. A dual-process model of the FP phenomena is proposed to interpret the dissociation found between the 2 effects.
Key Words: dorsolateral prefrontal • implicit temporal processing • sequential effects • theta burst • variable foreperiod
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Trivino, A. Correa, M. Arnedo, and J. Lupianez Temporal orienting deficit after prefrontal damage Brain, February 9, 2010; (2010) awp346v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Renaud, L. Bherer, and F. Maquestiaux A High Level of Physical Fitness Is Associated With More Efficient Response Preparation in Older Adults J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, February 5, 2010; (2010) gbq004v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. D. Walsh and M. L. Phillips Interacting Outcome Retrieval, Anticipation, and Feedback Processes in the Human Brain Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2010; 20(2): 271 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Catmur, V. Walsh, and C. Heyes Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system Phil Trans R Soc B, August 27, 2009; 364(1528): 2369 - 2380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. S. Narayanan and M. Laubach Delay Activity in Rodent Frontal Cortex During a Simple Reaction Time Task J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 2859 - 2871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Correa and A. C. Nobre Neural Modulation by Regularity and Passage of Time J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1649 - 1655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Gentner, K. Wankerl, C. Reinsberger, D. Zeller, and J. Classen Depression of Human Corticospinal Excitability Induced by Magnetic Theta-burst Stimulation: Evidence of Rapid Polarity-Reversing Metaplasticity Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 2046 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. T Stuss and M. P Alexander Is there a dysexecutive syndrome? Phil Trans R Soc B, May 29, 2007; 362(1481): 901 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|