Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on March 24, 2006
Cerebral Cortex 2007 17(2):425-433; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj159
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/425    most recent
bhj159v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turk-Browne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Chun, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turk-Browne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Chun, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Visual Quality Determines the Direction of Neural Repetition Effects

NB Turk-Browne, D-J Yi, AB Leber and MM Chun

Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520, USA

Address correspondence to Nicholas Turk-Browne, Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. Email: nicholas.turk-browne{at}yale.edu.

One ubiquitous finding in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies is that repeated stimuli elicit lower responses than novel stimuli. In apparent contradiction, some studies have reported the exact opposite effect—greater responses to repeated than novel stimuli—in many of the same brain regions. Interestingly, these latter enhancement effects are typically obtained when stimuli have been degraded. To explore this observation, the present study examines the degree to which visual quality mediates repetition effects in a stimulus-selective ventral visual area. Subjects were presented with grayscale photographs of scenes that were either near or substantially above visual threshold, as determined by calibrating image contrast to behavioral performance. The presentation of 2 identical high-contrast scenes elicited lower blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) responses than the presentation of 2 different high-contrast scenes (repetition attenuation). Conversely, the presentation of 2 identical low-contrast scenes elicited greater BOLD responses than the presentation of 2 different low-contrast scenes (repetition enhancement). Neurophysiological studies suggest that repetition attenuation in ventral visual areas may reflect the reactivation of perceptual representations that have become sparse and selective as a result of prior experience, whereas repetition enhancement may reflect spared access to existing representations by severely degraded input.

Key Words: parahippocampal place area • perceptual priming • repetition attenuation • repetition enhancement • repetition suppression • scene processing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. R. Buchsbaum and M. D'Esposito
Repetition Suppression and Reactivation in Auditory-Verbal Short-Term Recognition Memory
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2009; 19(6): 1474 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
I. Mukai, D. Kim, M. Fukunaga, S. Japee, S. Marrett, and L. G. Ungerleider
Activations in Visual and Attention-Related Areas Predict and Correlate with the Degree of Perceptual Learning
J. Neurosci., October 17, 2007; 27(42): 11401 - 11411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.