Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on January 31, 2007
Cerebral Cortex 2007 17(11):2479-2490; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl181
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feature Article |
Left Unilateral Neglect as a Disconnection Syndrome
1 INSERM Unit 610, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France, 2 Department of Neurology, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France, 3 Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France, 4 Centro Ricerche di Neuropsicologia, Fondazione Santa Lucia—Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00179 Roma, Italy, 5 Dipartimento di Psicologia 39, Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza," Roma, Italy
Address correspondence to Paolo Bartolomeo (Email: paolo.bartolomeo{at}chups.jussieu.fr) or to Fabrizio Doricchi (Email: fabrizio.doricchi{at}uniroma1.it).
Unilateral spatial neglect is a disabling neurological condition that typically results from right hemisphere damage. Neglect patients are unable to take into account information coming from the left side of space. The study of neglect is important for understanding the brain mechanisms of spatial cognition, but its anatomical correlates are currently the object of intense debate. We propose a reappraisal of the contribution of disconnection factors to the pathophysiology of neglect based on a review of animal and patient studies. These indicate that damage to the long-range white matter pathways connecting parietal and frontal areas within the right hemisphere may constitute a crucial antecedent of neglect. Thus, neglect would not result from the dysfunction of a single cortical region but from the disruption of large networks made up of distant cortical regions. In this perspective, we also reexamined the possible contribution to neglect of interhemispheric disconnection. The reviewed evidence, often present in previous studies but frequently overlooked, is consistent with the existence of distributed cortical networks for orienting of attention in the normal brain, has implications for theories of neglect and normal spatial processing, opens perspectives for research on brain–behavior relationships, and suggests new possibilities for patient diagnosis and rehabilitation.
Key Words: attention • brain lesions • perceptual disorders • spatial cognition • white matter fiber pathways
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. M. Umarova, D. Saur, S. Schnell, C. P. Kaller, M.-S. Vry, V. Glauche, M. Rijntjes, J. Hennig, V. Kiselev, and C. Weiller Structural Connectivity for Visuospatial Attention: Significance of Ventral Pathways Cereb Cortex, April 30, 2009; (2009) bhp086v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Rossit, P. Malhotra, K. Muir, I. Reeves, G. Duncan, K. Livingstone, H. Jackson, C. Hogg, P. Castle, G. Learmonth, et al. No Neglect-Specific Deficits in Reaching Tasks Cereb Cortex, March 12, 2009; (2009) bhp016v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-O. Karnath, C. Rorden, and L. F. Ticini Damage to White Matter Fiber Tracts in Acute Spatial Neglect Cereb Cortex, January 23, 2009; (2009) bhn250v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Koch, M. Oliveri, B. Cheeran, D. Ruge, E. L. Gerfo, S. Salerno, S. Torriero, B. Marconi, F. Mori, J. Driver, et al. Hyperexcitability of parietal-motor functional connections in the intact left-hemisphere of patients with neglect Brain, December 1, 2008; 131(12): 3147 - 3155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|