Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on November 30, 2006
Cerebral Cortex 2007 17(10):2258-2267; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl134
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/10/2258    most recent
bhl134v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lutzenberger, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lutzenberger, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Dynamics of Oscillatory Activity during Auditory Decision Making

Jochen Kaiser1, Therese Lennert2,3 and Werner Lutzenberger2

1 Institute of Medical Psychology, J. W. Goethe-University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2 MEG-Center, Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, 3 Graduate School of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

Address correspondence to Jochen Kaiser, Institute of Medical Psychology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Strasse 10, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Email: j.kaiser{at}med.uni-frankfurt.de.

Perceptual decision making requires the comparison and integration of sensory evidence to generate a behavioral response. We used magnetoencephalography to investigate the temporal dynamics of decision making during an auditory task that required forced-choice decisions about whether a pair of syllables S1 and S2 differed either in their acoustic patterns or in the perceived position of their sound sources. Conditions with easy and difficult decisions were created by varying the similarity of S1 and S2. Statistical probability mapping showed enhanced gamma-band activity (GBA) over posterior parietal cortex for spatial and over left inferior frontal cortex for pattern changes (at ~120 to 220 ms after S2 onset). Activations were stronger for easy than difficult decisions. GBA over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was more pronounced at ~280 to 430 ms for easy than difficult decisions regardless of type of change, possibly reflecting decision-relevant networks that integrate information from higher sensory areas representing the perceptual alternatives. Sensorimotor beta desynchronization as a measure of motor preparation peaked at ~460 ms for easy and at ~520 ms for difficult decisions, thus reflecting the reaction time difference between both conditions. In summary, the analysis of oscillatory activity in magnetoencephalogram served to elucidate the temporal dynamics of perceptual decision making in humans.

Key Words: auditory processing • decision making • gamma-band activity (GBA) • magnetoencephalography (MEG) • temporal dynamics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
J. Kaiser, T. Heidegger, M. Wibral, C. F. Altmann, and W. Lutzenberger
Distinct Gamma-Band Components Reflect the Short-Term Memory Maintenance of Different Sound Lateralization Angles
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2008; 18(10): 2286 - 2295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.