Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2005
Cerebral Cortex 2006 16(8):1097-1105; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/8/1097    most recent
bhj051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weisz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Schlittmeier, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weisz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Schlittmeier, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Detrimental Effects of Irrelevant Speech on Serial Recall of Visual Items are Reflected in Reduced Visual N1 and Reduced Theta Activity

Nathan Weisz1 and Sabine J. Schlittmeier2

1 Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany and 2 Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany

Address correspondence to Nathan Weisz, University of Konstanz, Department of Psychology, PO Box 25, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany. Email: Nathan.Weisz{at}uni-konstanz.de.

The term irrelevant sound effect (ISE) describes an empirically robust finding in which serial recall performance of visual items is reduced by irrelevant speech. At present little is known about its neurophysiological basis. Although some previous neuroelectric studies have concentrated on responses elicited by irrelevant background sound, whether the processing of visually presented to-be-remembered digits itself is affected by irrelevant speech has yet to be studied. An experiment (n = 20) was conducted in which serial recall performance for visually presented digits was tested during exposure to either irrelevant speech, continuous white noise or silence while measuring EEG activity. White noise was chosen as a control condition, because it constitutes auditory stimulation while leaving serial recall performance unimpaired. In addition to replicating the detrimental behavioural effect of irrelevant speech, an analogous speech-specific early decrease (~160 ms) in the visual ERP (N1) and subsequently a reduced theta response (4–6 Hz; 400–800 ms) at right prefrontal electrodes were observed. Although irrelevant sound presentation was restricted to the visual presentation phase, power spectra reveal that the weaker theta response for speech persisted in a silent retention phase before serial recall. Based on such data we propose reevaluating the role attention plays in explaining the ISE.

Key Words: EEG • irrelevant sound effect • ISE • N1 • theta


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.