Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on January 11, 2006
Cerebral Cortex 2006 16(12):1718-1728; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj107
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Auditory Processing Deficits in Dyslexia: Task or Stimulus Related?
1 Department of Neurobiology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel, 2 Department of Psychology and Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel, 3 Current address: Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Address correspondence to Dr Merav Ahissar, Department of Psychology, Hebrew University, Mt Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel. Email: msmerava{at}mscc.huji.ac.il.
The nature of the fundamental deficit underlying reading disability is the subject of a long-standing debate. We previously found that dyslexics with additional learning difficulties (D-LDs) perform poorly in simple auditory tasks. We now tried to determine whether these deficits relate to stimulus or task complexity. We found that the degree of impairment was dependent on task rather than stimulus complexity. D-LDs could adequately detect and identify mild frequency changes in simple pure tones and minimal phonemic changes in complex speech sounds when task required only simple same–different discriminations. However, when task required the identification of the direction of frequency change or the ordinal position of a repeated tonal or speech stimulus, D-LDs' performance substantially deteriorated. This behavioral pattern suggests that D-LDs suffer from a similar type of deficits when processing speech and nonspeech sounds. In both cases, the extent of difficulties is determined by the structure of the task rather than by stimulus composition or complexity.
Key Words: auditory processing • dyslexia • frequency discrimination • perceptual memory • perceptual processing • working memory
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Banai, J. Hornickel, E. Skoe, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, and N. Kraus Reading and Subcortical Auditory Function Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2009; 19(11): 2699 - 2707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Ahissar, M. Nahum, I. Nelken, and S. Hochstein Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2009; 364(1515): 285 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. A. Smith, L. J. Trainor, K. Gray, J. A. Plantinga, and D. I. Shore Stimulus, Task, and Learning Effects on Measures of Temporal Resolution: Implications for Predictors of Language Outcome J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1630 - 1642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Zettler, R. A. Sevcik, R. D. Morris, and M. G. Clarkson Comodulation Masking Release (CMR) in Children and the Influence of Reading Status J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2008; 51(3): 772 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Zhou and M. M. Merzenich Intensive training in adults refines A1 representations degraded in an early postnatal critical period PNAS, October 2, 2007; 104(40): 15935 - 15940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|