Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2005
Cerebral Cortex 2006 16(10):1453-1461; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj086
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex
1 School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2AS, UK, 2 Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 2EF, UK and 3 Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, NE20-454, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Address correspondence to Dr Paul E. Downing, School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2AS, UK. Email: p.downing{at}bangor.ac.uk.
We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categories in a blocked-design experiment. As expected, we found selectivity for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA), for scenes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), and for bodies in the extrastriate body area (EBA). In addition, we describe 3 main new findings. First, evidence for the selectivity of the FFA, PPA, and EBA was strengthened by the finding that each area responded significantly more strongly to its preferred category than to the next most effective of the remaining 19 stimulus categories tested. Second, a region in the middle temporal gyrus that has been reported to respond significantly more strongly to tools than to animals did not respond significantly more strongly to tools than to other nontool categories (such as fruits and vegetables), casting doubt on the characterization of this region as tool selective. Finally, we did not find any new regions in the occipitotemporal pathway that were strongly selective for other categories. Taken together, these results demonstrate both the strong selectivity of a small number of regions and the scarcity of such regions in visual cortex.
Key Words: bodies cortex faces fMRI scenes tools visual selectivity
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. C. Gur, J. D. Ragland, M. Reivich, J. H. Greenberg, A. Alavi, and R. E. Gur Regional Differences in the Coupling between Resting Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism may Indicate Action Preparedness as a Default State Cereb Cortex, June 4, 2008; (2008) bhn087v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Corradi-Dell'Acqua, M. D. Hesse, R. I. Rumiati, and G. R. Fink Where is a Nose with Respect to a Foot? The Left Posterior Parietal Cortex Processes Spatial Relationships among Body Parts Cereb Cortex, April 18, 2008; (2008) bhn046v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lamm and J. Decety Is the Extrastriate Body Area (EBA) Sensitive to the Perception of Pain in Others? Cereb Cortex, February 11, 2008; (2008) bhn006v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-C. Kung, J. J. Peissig, and M. J. Tarr Is Region-of-Interest Overlap Comparison a Reliable Measure of Category Specificity? J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2007; 19(12): 2019 - 2034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Taylor, A. J. Wiggett, and P. E. Downing Functional MRI Analysis of Body and Body Part Representations in the Extrastriate and Fusiform Body Areas J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1626 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Epstein and J. S. Higgins Differential Parahippocampal and Retrosplenial Involvement in Three Types of Visual Scene Recognition Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1680 - 1693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I. Baker, J. Liu, L. L. Wald, K. K. Kwong, T. Benner, and N. Kanwisher Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex PNAS, May 22, 2007; 104(21): 9087 - 9092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



