Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on September 30, 2004
Cerebral Cortex 2005 15(7):899-912; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh189
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cerebral Cortex V 15 N 7 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
Cognitive Control Involved in Overcoming Prepotent Response Tendencies and Switching Between Tasks
1 University of Pittsburgh, Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, 2 Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA and 3 University of California at Davis, Psychiatry and Psychology, Davis, CA 95817, USA
Address correspondence to A.D. Barber, University of Pittsburgh, Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Email: adbarber{at}pitt.edu.
A dissociable set of regions was active for the executive processing associated with overcoming a prepotent response tendency and task switching. Regions associated with overcoming prepotency were primarily frontal and may be part of a system involved in top-down biasing for conflict reduction. Posterior regions were recruited for switching between tasks and likely play a role in reconfiguring stimulusresponse mappings. Precuneus activity was common to both manipulations and may reflect increased visual attention due to more difficult task demands.
Key Words: frontal parietal task switching conflict effect preparation
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. M. Goghari and A. W. MacDonald III Effects of varying the experimental design of a cognitive control paradigm on behavioral and functional imaging outcome measures. J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2008; 20(1): 20 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. V. Lungu, T. Liu, T. Waechter, D. T. Willingham, and J. Ashe Strategic modulation of cognitive control. J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 19(8): 1302 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Caplan, A. R. McIntosh, and E. De Rosa Two Distinct Functional Networks for Successful Resolution of Proactive Interference Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1650 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Picton, D. T. Stuss, M. P. Alexander, T. Shallice, M. A. Binns, and S. Gillingham Effects of Focal Frontal Lesions on Response Inhibition Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2007; 17(4): 826 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chikazoe, S. Konishi, T. Asari, K. Jimura, and Y. Miyashita Activation of Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus during Response Inhibition across Response Modalities. J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2007; 19(1): 69 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rivaud-Pechoux, M. Vidailhet, J. P. Brandel, and B. Gaymard Mixing pro- and antisaccades in patients with parkinsonian syndromes Brain, January 1, 2007; 130(1): 256 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S Pohl, J. M McDowd, D. Filion, L. G Richards, W. Stiers, and P. Kluding Task Switching After Stroke Physical Therapy, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



