Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on July 6, 2004
Cerebral Cortex 2005 15(2):131-140; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh116
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cerebral Cortex V 15 N 2 © Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved
Article |
What Disconnection Tells about Motor Imagery: Evidence from Paraplegic Patients
1 Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland, 2 Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland, 3 Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland and 4 Institute of Neuroinformatics, University and ETH Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
Brain activation during motor imagery has been the subject of a large number of studies in healthy subjects, leading to divergent interpretations with respect to the role of descending pathways and kinesthetic feedback on the mental rehearsal of movements. We investigated patients with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) to find out how the complete disruption of motor efferents and sensory afferents influences brain activation during motor imagery of the disconnected feet. Eight SCI patients underwent behavioral assessment and functional magnetic resonance imaging. When compared to a healthy population, stronger activity was detected in primary and all non-primary motor cortical areas and subcortical regions. In paraplegic patients the primary motor cortex was consistently activated, even to the same degree as during movement execution in the controls. Motor imagery in SCI patients activated in parallel both the motor execution and motor imagery networks of healthy subjects. In paraplegics the extent of activation in the primary motor cortex and in mesial non-primary motor areas was significantly correlated with the vividness of movement imagery, as assessed by an interview. The present findings provide new insights on the neuroanatomy of motor imagery and the possible role of kinesthetic feedback in the suppression of cortical motor output required during covert movements.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. T. Jurkiewicz, D. J. Mikulis, W. E. McIlroy, M. G. Fehlings, and M. C. Verrier Sensorimotor Cortical Plasticity During Recovery Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal fMRI Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 527 - 538. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Dickstein and J. E Deutsch Motor Imagery in Physical Therapist Practice Physical Therapy, July 1, 2007; 87(7): 942 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Boulenger, A. C. Roy, Y. Paulignan, V. Deprez, M. Jeannerod, and T. A. Nazir Cross-talk between Language Processes and Overt Motor Behavior in the First 200 msec of Processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2006; 18(10): 1607 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Sharma, V. M. Pomeroy, and J.-C. Baron Motor Imagery: A Backdoor to the Motor System After Stroke? Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1941 - 1952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. C. Cramer, L. Lastra, M. G. Lacourse, and M. J. Cohen Brain motor system function after chronic, complete spinal cord injury Brain, December 1, 2005; 128(12): 2941 - 2950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|