Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on April 27, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/9/986    most recent
bhh059v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hester, R.
Right arrow Articles by Garavan, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hester, R.
Right arrow Articles by Garavan, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex September 2004; 14:986-994
© Oxford University Press 2004


Article

Individual Differences in Error Processing: A Review and Reanalysis of Three Event-related fMRI Studies Using the GO/NOGO Task

Robert Hester1, Catherine Fassbender1 and Hugh Garavan1,2

1 Department of Psychology and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, 2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA

Three previous studies using the GO/NOGO task were examined to characterize the pattern of functional activation seen during error-related processing. The large sample size (n = 44) also allowed investigation of the influence of individual differences in age, sex, self-reported absentmindedness and reaction speed on the level of activation. Errors were seen to activate a network of regions including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), bilateral insula, thalamus and right inferior parietal lobule. Split-half comparisons performed for each of the individual difference variables indicated greater ACC and pre-SMA activation for older subjects while slower responders showed greater activation in the parietal, lateral PFC, insula and ACC regions. Whereas males and females demonstrated equivalent levels of activation in both the ACC and insula, self-reported absentmindedness related to reduced activation in these regions. Our review of the current imaging literature on error-related activation indicates that, despite the use of a variety of other cognitive paradigms, the network of regions identified here is consistent with these previous studies, suggesting that these regions are critical to a ‘general’ error-related response. Furthermore, this response is, in part, influenced by individual differences in both demographic characteristics and behavioural performance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. Hahn, T. J. Ross, and E. A. Stein
Cingulate Activation Increases Dynamically with Response Speed under Stimulus Unpredictability
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1664 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
S. F. Taylor, E. R. Stern, and W. J. Gehring
Neural Systems for Error Monitoring: Recent Findings and Theoretical Perspectives
Neuroscientist, April 1, 2007; 13(2): 160 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
T. W. Picton, D. T. Stuss, M. P. Alexander, T. Shallice, M. A. Binns, and S. Gillingham
Effects of Focal Frontal Lesions on Response Inhibition
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2007; 17(4): 826 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
J. Fridriksson, K. L. Morrow, D. Moser, and G. C. Baylis
Age-Related Variability in Cortical Activity During Language Processing.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2006; 49(4): 690 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. M. L. Chuah, V. Venkatraman, D. F. Dinges, and M. W. L. Chee
The neural basis of interindividual variability in inhibitory efficiency after sleep deprivation.
J. Neurosci., July 5, 2006; 26(27): 7156 - 7162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Magno, J. J. Foxe, S. Molholm, I. H. Robertson, and H. Garavan
The anterior cingulate and error avoidance.
J. Neurosci., May 3, 2006; 26(18): 4769 - 4773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. F. Taylor, B. Martis, K. D. Fitzgerald, R. C. Welsh, J. L. Abelson, I. Liberzon, J. A. Himle, and W. J. Gehring
Medial Frontal Cortex Activity and Loss-Related Responses to Errors
J. Neurosci., April 12, 2006; 26(15): 4063 - 4070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
J. Ito and J. Kitagawa
Performance Monitoring and Error Processing During a Lexical Decision Task in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, March 1, 2006; 19(1): 46 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. E. Polli, J. J. S. Barton, M. S. Cain, K. N. Thakkar, S. L. Rauch, and D. S. Manoach
Rostral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex make dissociable contributions during antisaccade error commission
PNAS, October 25, 2005; 102(43): 15700 - 15705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
P. Johansson, L. Hall, S. Sikstrom, and A. Olsson
Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task
Science, October 7, 2005; 310(5745): 116 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. R. Ridderinkhof, M. Ullsperger, E. A. Crone, and S. Nieuwenhuis
The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control
Science, October 15, 2004; 306(5695): 443 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.