Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Winer, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Winer, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex April 2004; 14:441-451
© Oxford University Press 2004


Article

Concurrent Tonotopic Processing Streams in Auditory Cortex

Charles C. Lee1, Kazuo Imaizumi2, Christoph E. Schreiner2 and Jeffery A. Winer1

1 Division of Neurobiology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA, 2 Coleman Memorial Laboratory, W.M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0732, USA

The basis for multiple representations of equivalent frequency ranges in auditory cortex was studied with physiological and anatomical methods. Our goal was to trace the convergence of thalamic, commissural, and corticocortical information upon two tonotopic fields in the cat, the primary auditory cortex (AI) and the anterior auditory field (AAF). Both fields are among the first cortical levels of processing. After neurophysiological mapping of characteristic frequency, we injected different retrograde tracers at separate, frequency-matched loci in AI and AAF. We found differences in their projections that support the notion of largely segregated parallel processing streams in the auditory thalamus and cerebral cortex. In each field, ipsilateral cortical input amounts to ~70% of the number of cells projecting to an isofrequency domain, while commissural and thalamic sources are each ~15%. Labeled thalamic and cortical neurons were concentrated in tonotopically predicted regions and in smaller loci far from their spectrally predicted positions. The few double-labeled thalamic neurons (<2%) are consistent with the hypothesis that information to AI and AAF travels along independent processing streams despite widespread regional overlap of thalamic input sources. Double labeling is also sparse in both the corticocortical and commissural systems (~1%), confirming their independence. The segregation of frequency-specific channels within thalamic and cortical systems is consistent with a model of parallel processing in auditory cortex. The global convergence of cells outside the targeted frequency domain in AI and AAF could contribute to context-dependent processing and to intracortical plasticity and reorganization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Carrasco and S. G. Lomber
Differential Modulatory Influences between Primary Auditory Cortex and the Anterior Auditory Field
J. Neurosci., July 1, 2009; 29(26): 8350 - 8362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Bendor and X. Wang
Neural Response Properties of Primary, Rostral, and Rostrotemporal Core Fields in the Auditory Cortex of Marmoset Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 888 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. K. Pandya, D. L. Rathbun, R. Moucha, N. D. Engineer, and M. P. Kilgard
Spectral and Temporal Processing in Rat Posterior Auditory Cortex
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 301 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Upadhyay, M. Ducros, T. A. Knaus, K. A. Lindgren, A. Silver, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D.-S. Kim
Function and Connectivity in Human Primary Auditory Cortex: A Combined fMRI and DTI Study at 3 Tesla
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 2420 - 2432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. B. Polley, H. L. Read, D. A. Storace, and M. M. Merzenich
Multiparametric Auditory Receptive Field Organization Across Five Cortical Fields in the Albino Rat
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3621 - 3638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Gourevitch and J. J. Eggermont
Spatial Representation of Neural Responses to Natural and Altered Conspecific Vocalizations in Cat Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 144 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Eggermont
Properties of Correlated Neural Activity Clusters in Cat Auditory Cortex Resemble Those of Neural Assemblies
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 746 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. C. Lee and J. A. Winer
Principles Governing Auditory Cortex Connections
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2005; 15(11): 1804 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Kajikawa, L. de La Mothe, S. Blumell, and T. A. Hackett
A Comparison of Neuron Response Properties in Areas A1 and CM of the Marmoset Monkey Auditory Cortex: Tones and Broadband Noise
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 22 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Tomita and J. J. Eggermont
Cross-Correlation and Joint Spectro-Temporal Receptive Field Properties in Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 378 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Imaizumi, N. J. Priebe, P. A. C. Crum, P. H. Bedenbaugh, S. W. Cheung, and C. E. Schreiner
Modular Functional Organization of Cat Anterior Auditory Field
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 444 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.