Cerebral Cortex March 2004; 14:314-331
© Oxford University Press 2004
Neural Responses during Interception of Real and Apparent Circularly Moving Stimuli in Motor Cortex and Area 7a
1 Brain Sciences Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA, 2 Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA, 3 Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA, 4 Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
We recorded the neuronal activity in the arm area of the motor cortex and parietal area 7a of two monkeys during interception of stimuli moving in real and apparent motion. The stimulus moved along a circular path with one of five speeds (180–540°/s), and was intercepted at 6 o’clock by exerting a force pulse on a semi-isometric joystick which controlled a cursor on the screen. The real stimuli were shown in adjacent positions every 16 ms, whereas in the apparent motion situation five stimuli were flashed successively at the vertices of a regular pentagon. The results showed, first, that a group of neurons in both areas above responded not only during the interception but also during a NOGO task in which the same stimuli were presented in the absence of a motor response. This finding suggests these areas are involved in both the processing of the stimulus as well as in the preparation and production of the interception movement. In addition, a group of motor cortical cells responded during the interception task but not during a center 
out task, in which the monkeys produced similar force pulses towards eight stationary targets. This group of cells may be engaged in sensorimotor transformations more specific to the interception of real and apparent moving stimuli. Finally, a multiple regression analysis revealed that the time-varying neuronal activity in area 7a and motor cortex was related to various aspects of stimulus motion and hand force in both the real and apparent motion conditions, with stimulus-related activity prevailing in area 7a and hand-related activity prevailing in motor cortex. In addition, the neural activity was selectively associated with the stimulus angle during real motion, whereas it was tightly correlated to the time-to-contact in the apparent motion condition, particularly in the motor cortex. Overall, these observations indicate that neurons in motor cortex and area 7a are processing different parameters of the stimulus depending on the kind of stimulus motion, and that this information is used in a predictive fashion in motor cortex to trigger the interception movement.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. B. Averbeck, A. Battaglia-Mayer, C. Guglielmo, and R. Caminiti Statistical Analysis of Parieto-Frontal Cognitive-Motor Networks J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1911 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Tziridis, P. W. Dicke, and P. Thier The Role of the Monkey Dorsal Pontine Nuclei in Goal-Directed Eye and Hand Movements J. Neurosci., May 13, 2009; 29(19): 6154 - 6166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Bosco, M. Carrozzo, and F. Lacquaniti Contributions of the Human Temporoparietal Junction and MT/V5+ to the Timing of Interception Revealed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation J. Neurosci., November 12, 2008; 28(46): 12071 - 12084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Merchant, W. Zarco, and L. Prado Do We Have a Common Mechanism for Measuring Time in the Hundreds of Millisecond Range? Evidence From Multiple-Interval Timing Tasks J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 939 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. E. Brown, E. T. Wilson, M. A. Goodale, and P. L. Gribble Motor Force Field Learning Influences Visual Processing of Target Motion J. Neurosci., September 12, 2007; 27(37): 9975 - 9983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. Logan and C. J. Duffy Cortical Area MSTd Combines Visual Cues to Represent 3-D Self-Movement Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1494 - 1507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Merchant and A. P. Georgopoulos Neurophysiology of Perceptual and Motor Aspects of Interception J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 1 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Roitman, S. Pasalar, M. T. V. Johnson, and T. J. Ebner Position, Direction of Movement, and Speed Tuning of Cerebellar Purkinje Cells during Circular Manual Tracking in Monkey J. Neurosci., October 5, 2005; 25(40): 9244 - 9257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Zago and F. Lacquaniti Internal Model of Gravity for Hand Interception: Parametric Adaptation to Zero-Gravity Visual Targets on Earth J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1346 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Indovina, V. Maffei, G. Bosco, M. Zago, E. Macaluso, and F. Lacquaniti Representation of Visual Gravitational Motion in the Human Vestibular Cortex Science, April 15, 2005; 308(5720): 416 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|