Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pavlova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Birbaumer, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pavlova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Birbaumer, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex February 2004; 14:181-188
© Oxford University Press 2004

Dissociable Cortical Processing of Recognizable and Non-recognizable Biological Movement: Analysing Gamma MEG Activity

Marina Pavlova1,2, Werner Lutzenberger1, Alexander Sokolov3 and Niels Birbaumer1,4

1 Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, MEG-Center, University of Tübingen, Germany, 2 Department of Paediatric Neurology and Child Development, Children’s Hospital, University of Tübingen, Germany, 3 Institute of Psychology, Braunschweig University of Technology, Braunschweig, Germany, 4 Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

Recognition of biological motion is one of the essential ingredients of human evolutionary survival. When biological motion is revealed solely by a set of light dots on the joints of an invisible human figure, the perceptual system reliably distinguishes it from similar configurations. Here, we assessed the changes in neuromagnetic cortical responses during visual perception of biological motion. Healthy humans saw a randomized set of stimuli consisting of a point-light canonical walker and a scrambled configuration in which the spatial positions of dots were randomly rearranged on the screen. In separate runs, configurations were presented either within an upright or inverted (180°) orientation in the image plane. Participants performed a one-back repetition task lifting a forefinger in response to the second of two consecutive identical stimuli of each type. Both recognizable upright and non-recognizable inverted walkers evoke enhancements in oscillatory gamma brain activity (25–30 Hz) over the left occipital cortices as early as 100 ms from stimulus onset. Only a recognizable upright walker, however, yields further consecutive peaks over the parietal (130 ms) and right temporal (170 ms) lobes. Scrambled displays do not elicit any increases in the gamma response. The stimulus-specific time course and topographic dynamics of cortical oscillatory activity indicate that the brain rapidly dissociates spatial coherence and meaning revealed through biological movement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. Pavlova, A. N. Sokolov, N. Birbaumer, and I. Krageloh-Mann
Perception and understanding of others' actions and brain connectivity.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2008; 20(3): 494 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Pavlova, N. Birbaumer, and A. Sokolov
Attentional Modulation of Cortical Neuromagnetic Gamma Response to Biological Movement
Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2006; 16(3): 321 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Pavlova, A. Sokolov, M. Staudt, F. Marconato, N. Birbaumer, and I. Krageloh-Mann
Recruitment of Periventricular Parietal Regions in Processing Cluttered Point-Light Biological Motion
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2005; 15(5): 594 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.