Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (107)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Itier, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Itier, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex February 2004; 14:132-142
© Oxford University Press 2004

N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal Differences between Object and Face Processing Using ERPs

Roxane J. Itier1 and Margot J. Taylor2

1 The Rotman Research Institute — Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Canada, 2 CerCo-CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France

The ERP component N170 is face-sensitive, yet its specificity for faces is controversial. We recorded ERPs while subjects viewed upright and inverted faces and seven object categories. Peak, topography and segmentation analyses were performed. N170 was earlier and larger to faces than to all objects. The classic increase in amplitude and latency was found for inverted faces on N170 but also on P1. Segmentation analyses revealed an extra map found only for faces, reflecting an extra cluster of activity compared to objects. While the N1 for objects seems to reflect the return to baseline from the P1, the N170 for faces reflects a supplement activity. The electrophysiological ‘specificity’ of faces could lie in the involvement of extra generators for face processing compared to objects and the N170 for faces seems qualitatively different from the N1 for objects. Object and face processing also differed as early as 120 ms.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Atten Percept PsychophysHome page
K. K. Sreenivasan, J. M. Goldstein, A. G. Lustig, L. R. Rivas, and A. P. Jha
Attention to faces modulates early face processing during low but not high face discriminability
Atten Percept Psychophys, May 1, 2009; 71(4): 837 - 846.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Gilboa, C. Alain, Y. He, D. T. Stuss, and M. Moscovitch
Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Lesions Produce Early Functional Alterations during Remote Memory Retrieval
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2009; 29(15): 4871 - 4881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soc Cogn Affect NeurosciHome page
R. Righart and B. de Gelder
Rapid influence of emotional scenes on encoding of facial expressions: an ERP study
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, September 1, 2008; 3(3): 270 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. J. Barbeau, M. J. Taylor, J. Regis, P. Marquis, P. Chauvel, and C. Liegeois-Chauvel
Spatio temporal Dynamics of Face Recognition
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 997 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Harris and K. Nakayama
Rapid Adaptation of the M170 Response: Importance of Face Parts
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 467 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Righart and B. de Gelder
Impaired face and body perception in developmental prosopagnosia
PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 17234 - 17238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. Zion-Golumbic and S. Bentin
Dissociated Neural Mechanisms for Face Detection and Configural Encoding: Evidence from N170 and Induced Gamma-Band Oscillation Effects
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2007; 17(8): 1741 - 1749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. Jacques and B. Rossion
Electrophysiological Evidence for Temporal Dissociation between Spatial Attention and Sensory Competition during Human Face Processing
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2007; 17(5): 1055 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Harris and K. Nakayama
Rapid Face-Selective Adaptation of an Early Extrastriate Component in MEG
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2007; 17(1): 63 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
R. Righart and B. de Gelder
Context Influences Early Perceptual Analysis of Faces--An Electrophysiological Study
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2006; 16(9): 1249 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Arzy, G. Thut, C. Mohr, C. M. Michel, and O. Blanke
Neural Basis of Embodiment: Distinct Contributions of Temporoparietal Junction and Extrastriate Body Area
J. Neurosci., August 2, 2006; 26(31): 8074 - 8081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
G. Kovacs, M. Zimmer, E. Banko, I. Harza, A. Antal, and Z. Vidnyanszky
Electrophysiological Correlates of Visual Adaptation to Faces and Body Parts in Humans
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2006; 16(5): 742 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
O. Blanke, C. Mohr, C. M. Michel, A. Pascual-Leone, P. Brugger, M. Seeck, T. Landis, and G. Thut
Linking Out-of-Body Experience and Self Processing to Mental Own-Body Imagery at the Temporoparietal Junction
J. Neurosci., January 19, 2005; 25(3): 550 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Rossion, C.-C. Kung, and M. J. Tarr
Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex
PNAS, October 5, 2004; 101(40): 14521 - 14526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.