Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on June 24, 2004
Cerebral Cortex 2004 14(12):1384-1389; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh099
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Oxford University Press 2004
Article |
Distinct Frontal Regions Subserve Evaluation of Linguistic and Emotional Aspects of Speech Intonation
1 Department of General Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Germany and 2 Section MR of CNS, Department of Neuroradiology, University of Tübingen, Germany
In addition to the propositional content of verbal utterances, significant linguistic and emotional information is conveyed by the tone of speech. To differentiate brain regions subserving processing of linguistic and affective aspects of intonation, discrimination of sentences differing in linguistic accentuation and emotional expressiveness was evaluated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Both tasks yielded rightward lateralization of hemodynamic responses at the level of the dorsolateral frontal cortex as well as bilateral thalamic and temporal activation. Processing of linguistic and affective intonation, thus, seems to be supported by overlapping neural networks comprising partially right-sided brain regions. Comparison of hemodynamic activation during the two different tasks, however, revealed bilateral orbito-frontal responses restricted to the affective condition as opposed to activation of the left lateral inferior frontal gyrus confined to evaluation of linguistic intonation. These findings indicate that distinct frontal regions contribute to higher level processing of intonational information depending on its communicational function. In line with other components of language processing, discrimination of linguistic accentuation seems to be lateralized to the left inferior-lateral frontal region whereas bilateral orbito-frontal areas subserve evaluation of emotional expressiveness.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. H. Lee and G. J. Siegle Common and distinct brain networks underlying explicit emotional evaluation: a meta-analytic study Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, March 6, 2009; (2009) nsp001v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. M. Dinn, D. A. Gansler, N. Moczynski, and C. Fulwiler Brain Dysfunction and Community Violence in Patients With Major Mental Illness Criminal Justice and Behavior, February 1, 2009; 36(2): 117 - 136. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. K. Ischebeck, A. D. Friederici, and K. Alter Processing Prosodic Boundaries in Natural and Hummed Speech: An fMRI Study Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2008; 18(3): 541 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Beaucousin, A. Lacheret, M.-R. Turbelin, M. Morel, B. Mazoyer, and N. Tzourio-Mazoyer FMRI Study of Emotional Speech Comprehension Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 339 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. T. Wang, S. S. Lee, M. Sigman, and M. Dapretto Developmental changes in the neural basis of interpreting communicative intent Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, September 1, 2006; 1(2): 107 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. T. Wang, S. S. Lee, M. Sigman, and M. Dapretto Neural basis of irony comprehension in children with autism: the role of prosody and context Brain, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 932 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Crinion and C. J. Price Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke Brain, December 1, 2005; 128(12): 2858 - 2871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|