Cerebral Cortex January 2004; 14:81-90
© Oxford University Press 2004
Training-induced Recovery of Visual Motion Perception after Extrastriate Cortical Damage in the Adult Cat
1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester NY 14642, USA, 2 Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, University of Rochester, Rochester NY 14642, USA, 3 Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester NY 14642, USA
Unilateral ibotenic acid lesions of the lateral suprasylvian (LS) cortex severely impair the ability of cats to integrate local motion signals (measured as direction range thresholds) and to extract motion signals from noise (measured as motion signal thresholds) in their contra-lesional visual hemifields. These deficits were found up to several months after the lesions and were limited to thresholds measured with random-dot stimuli, while contrast sensitivity for discriminating the direction of motion of sine-wave gratings remained unaffected. Our goal was to determine whether deficits of complex motion perception could recover and whether the recovery was spontaneous or required retraining. In each cat, a single location in the impaired visual hemifield was selected for visual retraining, which required the animals to discriminate motion direction using random-dot stimuli in which the range of dot directions was varied. Fifteen to 40 days of intensive retraining led to a gradual, complete recovery of motion integration. The recovery was stimulus specific since it did not transfer from direction range to motion signal thresholds, and it was largely restricted to the visual field locations retrained. Delaying the onset of retraining by several days to several months had no significant impact on the extent or rate of recovery. Once recovery was achieved, performance remained stable over a period of several months. These results suggest that recovery of complex visual motion perception after lesions of extrastriate visual cortex is an active process that requires extensive, stimulus- and retinotopically-specific visual retraining.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. R. Huxlin, T. Martin, K. Kelly, M. Riley, D. I. Friedman, W. S. Burgin, and M. Hayhoe Perceptual Relearning of Complex Visual Motion after V1 Damage in Humans J. Neurosci., April 1, 2009; 29(13): 3981 - 3991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. S. Marshall, J. J. Ferrera, A. Barnes, Xian Zhang, K. A. O'Brien, M. Chmayssani, J. Hirsch, and R. M. Lazar Brain Activity Associated With Stimulation Therapy of the Visual Borderzone in Hemianopic Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 136 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. D. Takahashi, L. Der-Yeghiaian, V. Le, R. R. Motiwala, and S. C. Cramer Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke Brain, February 1, 2008; 131(2): 425 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. A. Berman, L. M. Heiser, R. C. Saunders, and C. L. Colby Dynamic Circuitry for Updating Spatial Representations. I. Behavioral Evidence for Interhemispheric Transfer in the Split-Brain Macaque J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3228 - 3248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Constantinescu, L. Schmidt, R. Watson, and R. F. Hess A Residual Deficit for Global Motion Processing after Acuity Recovery in Deprivation Amblyopia Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 3008 - 3012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|