Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swindale, N. V.
Right arrow Articles by Shmuel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swindale, N. V.
Right arrow Articles by Shmuel, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 13, No. 3, 225-238, March 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

The Spatial Pattern of Response Magnitude and Selectivity for Orientation and Direction in Cat Visual Cortex

Nicholas V. Swindale, Amiram Grinvald1 and Amir Shmuel1,2

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada V5Z 3N9, , 1 Department of Neurobiology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel and , 2 Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Address correspondence to Dr Nicholas V. Swindale, Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, 2550 Willow St., Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 3N9. Email: swindale{at}interchange.ubc.ca.

Optical imaging studies of orientation and direction preference in visual cortex have typically used vector averaging to obtain angle and magnitude maps. This method has shown half-rotation orientation singularities (pinwheels) located within regions of low orientation vector magnitude. Direction preference is generally orthogonal to orientation preference, but often deviates from this, particularly in regions of low direction vector magnitude. Linear regions of rapid change in direction preference terminate in or near orientation singularities. The vector-averaging method is problematic however because it does not clearly disambiguate spatial variation in orientation tuning width from variation in height. It may also wrongly estimate preferred direction in regions where preference is weak. In this paper we analyze optical maps of cat visual cortex by fitting model tuning functions to the responses. This new method reveals features not previously evident. Orientation tuning height and width vary independently across the map: tuning height is always low near singularities, however regions of broad and narrow orientation tuning width can be found in regions of low tuning height, often alternating in a spoke-like fashion around singularities. Orientation and direction preference angles are always closely orthogonal. Reversals in direction preference form lines that originate precisely in orientation singularities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. A. Zhan and C. L. Baker Jr
Boundary Cue Invariance in Cortical Orientation Maps
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 896 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Xu, W. H. Bosking, L. E. White, D. Fitzpatrick, and V. A. Casagrande
Functional Organization of Visual Cortex in the Prosimian Bush Baby Revealed by Optical Imaging of Intrinsic Signals
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2748 - 2762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Wang, S. Ding, and K. Yunokuchi
Representation of Cardinal Contour Overlaps Less With Representation of Nearby Angles in Cat Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3912 - 3920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.