Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 13, No. 1, 90-99,
January 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Columns for Complex Visual Object Features in the Inferotemporal Cortex: Clustering of Cells with Similar but Slightly Different Stimulus Selectivities
RIKEN Brain Research Institute, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
Address correspondence to Keiji Tanaka, RIKEN Brain Research Institute, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. Email: keiji{at}postman.riken.go.jp.
Cells in the inferotemporal cortex (area TE) selectively respond to complex visual object features and those that respond to similar features cluster in a columnar region elongated vertical to the cortical surface. What are the functional roles of the column structure in the inferotemporal cortex? Selectivity of cells within a column is similar but not identical. If we emphasize the similarity among cells within a column, we can regard the columns as units for description of object features. The variety of stimulus selectivity in a column may work as a tool to disregard subtle changes in input images when the system is directed to invariant recognition. Alternatively, if we emphasize the differences in selectivity of cells within a column, the columns can be compared to differential amplifiers, each of which represents variety within a group of features. The enormous number of objects present in nature can be efficiently described by combining outputs of the multiple differential amplifiers in the inferotemporal cortex. The two modes may work in parallel, with a graded balance changing according to the behavioral context. Determining whether or not these hypotheses are valid will require further studies.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. D. Dahl, N. K. Logothetis, and C. Kayser Spatial Organization of Multisensory Responses in Temporal Association Cortex J. Neurosci., September 23, 2009; 29(38): 11924 - 11932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Michler, R. Eckhorn, and T. Wachtler Using Spatiotemporal Correlations to Learn Topographic Maps for Invariant Object Recognition J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 953 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Bell, F. Hadj-Bouziane, J. B. Frihauf, R. B. H. Tootell, and L. G. Ungerleider Object Representations in the Temporal Cortex of Monkeys and Humans as Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 688 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Y. Tsao, S. Moeller, and W. A. Freiwald Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans PNAS, December 9, 2008; 105(49): 19514 - 19519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Op de Beeck, J. J. DiCarlo, J. B. M. Goense, K. Grill-Spector, A. Papanastassiou, M. Tanifuji, and D. Y. Tsao Fine-Scale Spatial Organization of Face and Object Selectivity in the Temporal Lobe: Do Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Optical Imaging, and Electrophysiology Agree? J. Neurosci., November 12, 2008; 28(46): 11796 - 11801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Li and J. J. DiCarlo Unsupervised Natural Experience Rapidly Alters Invariant Object Representation in Visual Cortex Science, September 12, 2008; 321(5895): 1502 - 1507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Op de Beeck, J. A. Deutsch, W. Vanduffel, N. G. Kanwisher, and J. J. DiCarlo A Stable Topography of Selectivity for Unfamiliar Shape Classes in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1676 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Schendan and C. E. Stern Where Vision Meets Memory: Prefrontal-Posterior Networks for Visual Object Constancy during Categorization and Recognition Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1695 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Q. Gentner Surprising Twist on Auditory Representation. Focus on: "What's That Sound? Auditory Area CLM Encodes Stimulus Surprise, Not Intensity or Intensity Changes" J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2755 - 2756. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Jortner, S. S. Farivar, and G. Laurent A Simple Connectivity Scheme for Sparse Coding in an Olfactory System J. Neurosci., February 14, 2007; 27(7): 1659 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Op de Beeck, C. I. Baker, J. J. DiCarlo, and N. G. Kanwisher Discrimination Training Alters Object Representations in Human Extrastriate Cortex J. Neurosci., December 13, 2006; 26(50): 13025 - 13036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Freedman, M. Riesenhuber, T. Poggio, and E. K. Miller Experience-Dependent Sharpening of Visual Shape Selectivity in Inferior Temporal Cortex Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2006; 16(11): 1631 - 1644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Nielsen, N. K. Logothetis, and G. Rainer Dissociation between local field potentials and spiking activity in macaque inferior temporal cortex reveals diagnosticity-based encoding of complex objects. J. Neurosci., September 20, 2006; 26(38): 9639 - 9645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kayaert, I. Biederman, and R. Vogels Representation of Regular and Irregular Shapes in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2005; 15(9): 1308 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




