Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linden, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiner, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linden, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiner, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 13, No. 1, 83-89, January 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Columnar Transformations in Auditory Cortex? A Comparison to Visual and Somatosensory Cortices

Jennifer F. Linden and Christoph E. Schreiner

W.M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California — San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0732, USA

Address correspondence to Dr Jennifer F. Linden, Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California — San Francisco, Room HSE804, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143–0732, USA. Email: linden{at}phy.ucsf.edu.

Auditory cortical columns have been studied for decades, but intracolumnar processing in auditory cortex is still poorly understood, relative to what is known about such processsing in visual cortex and somatosensory cortex. While there are certainly striking similarities in cortical structure across the modalities, investigations of auditory cortex anatomy and synaptic physiology have also found important differences from the columnar organization of other sensory cortices. In vitro and in vivo studies of thalamocortical transformations in the auditory system have begun to reveal the functional significance of these differences, and have defined the earliest stages of auditory cortical processing. However, the question of what transformations are performed within auditory cortical columns remains unresolved. Attempts to find laminar differences in auditory cortex, which could provide the key to understanding columnar transformations, have so far produced contradictory and inconclusive results. Direct analogies to primary visual and somatic sensory cortices would suggest that response properties such as bandwidth, inhibitory sideband structure, preferred modulation rate and modulation phase sensitivity might vary across layers in auditory cortex. While such analogies could prove useful as guidelines for future research, the best hope for understanding auditory columnar transformations may lie instead with a more modality-specific, functional approach.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Huggenberger, M. Vater, and R. A. Deisz
Interlaminar Differences of Intrinsic Properties of Pyramidal Neurons in the Auditory Cortex of Mice
Cereb Cortex, September 4, 2008; (2008) bhn143v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Foffani, J. K. Chapin, and K. A. Moxon
Computational Role of Large Receptive Fields in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 268 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A.-M. M. Oswald and A. D. Reyes
Maturation of Intrinsic and Synaptic Properties of Layer 2/3 Pyramidal Neurons in Mouse Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2998 - 3008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
J. Z. Simon, D. A. Depireux, D. J. Klein, J. B. Fritz, and S. A. Shamma
Temporal symmetry in primary auditory cortex: implications for cortical connectivity.
Neural Comput., March 1, 2007; 19(3): 583 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Soto, N. Kopell, and K. Sen
Network Architecture, Receptive Fields, and Neuromodulation: Computational and Functional Implications of Cholinergic Modulation in Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2972 - 2983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. A. Campbell, J. W. H. Schnupp, A. Shial, and A. J. King
Binaural-Level Functions in Ferret Auditory Cortex: Evidence for a Continuous Distribution of Response Properties
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3742 - 3755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. Tutunculer, G. Foffani, B. T. Himes, and K. A. Moxon
Structure of the Excitatory Receptive Fields of Infragranular Forelimb Neurons in the Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex Responding To Touch
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 791 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. F. McLaughlin and S. L. Juliano
Disruption of Layer 4 Development Alters Laminar Processing in Ferret Somatosensory Cortex
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2005; 15(11): 1791 - 1803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. M. Martin, M. F. West, and P. H. Bedenbaugh
Masking and scrambling in the auditory thalamus of awake rats by Gaussian and modulated noises
PNAS, October 12, 2004; 101(41): 14961 - 14965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.