Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Windmann, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kutas, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Windmann, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kutas, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 12, No. 8, 808-817, August 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Decision Biases in Recognition Memory

Sabine Windmann1,2, Thomas P. Urbach1 and Marta Kutas1,3

1 Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, , 2 AE Biopsychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany, , 3 Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, CA, USA

Corresponding author: Dr Sabine Windmann, Ruhr-University Bochum, Faculty of Psychology, AE Biopsychology, GAFO 05/623, 44780 Bochum, Germany. Email sabine.windmann{at}ruhr-uni-bochum.de.

In recognition memory tasks, stimuli can be classified as ‘old’ either on the basis of accurate memory or a bias to respond ‘old’, yet bias has received little attention in the cognitive neuroscience literature. Here we examined the pattern and timing of bias-related effects in event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to determine whether the bias is linked more to memory retrieval or to response verification processes. Participants were divided into a High Bias and a Low Bias group according to their bias to respond ‘old’. These groups did not differ in recognition accuracy or in the ERP pattern to items that actually were old versus new (Objective Old/New Effect). However, when the old/new distinction was based on each subject’s perspective, i.e. when items judged ‘old’ were compared with those judged ‘new’ (Subjective Old/New Effect), significant group differences were observed over prefrontal sites with a timing (300–500 ms poststimulus) more consistent with bias acting early on memory retrieval processes than on post-retrieval response verification processes. In the standard old/new effect (Hits vs Correct Rejections), these group differences were intermediate to those for the Objective and the Subjective comparisons, indicating that such comparisons are confounded by response bias. We propose that these biases are top-down controlled processes mediated by prefrontal cortex areas.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
N. Azimian-Faridani and E. L. Wilding
The influence of criterion shifts on electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2006; 18(7): 1075 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.