Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Acuna, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sanes, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Acuna, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sanes, J. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 12, No. 12, 1312-1321, December 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Frontal and Parietal Lobe Activation during Transitive Inference in Humans

Bettina D. Acuna1,2, James C. Eliassen1, John P. Donoghue1 and Jerome N. Sanes1

1 Department of Neuroscience, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI 02912 USA

Address correspondence to Dr Jerome N. Sanes, Department of Neuroscience, Brown Medical School, Box 1953, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Email: Jerome_Sanes{at}Brown.edu.

Cortical areas engaged in knowledge manipulation during reasoning were identified with functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while participants performed transitive inference (TI) on an ordered list of 11 items (e.g. if A < B and B < C, then A < C). Initially, participants learned a list of arbitrarily ordered visual shapes. Learning occurred by exposure to pairs of list items that were adjacent in the sequence. Subsequently, functional MR images were acquired as participants performed TI on non-adjacent sequence items. Control tasks consisted of height comparisons (HT) and passive viewing (VIS). Comparison of the TI task with the HT task identified activation resulting from TI, termed ‘reasoning’, while controlling for rule application, decision processes, perception, and movement, collectively termed ‘support processes’. The HT–VIS comparison revealed activation related to support processes. The TI reasoning network included bilateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA), premotor area (PMA), insula, precuneus, and lateral posterior parietal cortex. By contrast, cortical regions activated by support processes included the bilateral supplementary motor area (SMA), primary motor cortex (M1), somatic sensory cortices, and right PMA. These results emphasize the role of a prefrontal–parietal network in manipulating information to form new knowledge based on familiar facts. The findings also demonstrate PFC activation beyond short-term memory to include mental operations associated with reasoning.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
V. Goel, M. Tierney, L. Sheesley, A. Bartolo, O. Vartanian, and J. Grafman
Hemispheric Specialization in Human Prefrontal Cortex for Resolving Certain and Uncertain Inferences
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 2245 - 2250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
A. J. Greene, W. L. Gross, C. L. Elsinger, and S. M. Rao
An FMRI analysis of the human hippocampus: inference, context, and task awareness.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2006; 18(7): 1156 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
D. Ongur, T. J. Cullen, D. H. Wolf, M. Rohan, P. Barreira, M. Zalesak, and S. Heckers
The neural basis of relational memory deficits in schizophrenia.
Arch Gen Psychiatry, April 1, 2006; 63(4): 356 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
V. Goel, M. Makale, and J. Grafman
The Hippocampal System Mediates Logical Reasoning about Familiar Spatial Environments
J. Cogn. Neurosci., May 1, 2004; 16(4): 654 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.