Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Passetti, F.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Passetti, F.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, T. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 12, No. 12, 1254-1268, December 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

The Frontal Cortex of the Rat and Visual Attentional Performance: Dissociable Functions of Distinct Medial Prefrontal Subregions

Filippo Passetti, Yogita Chudasama and Trevor W. Robbins

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Address correspondence to Professor Trevor W. Robbins, Department of Experimental Psychology, Downing Street, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK. Email: twr2{at}cus.cam.ac.uk.

A previous study using a rodent five-choice test of attention found poor choice accuracy and increased perseverative responding following medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) lesions. As this rat cortical area includes at least two anatomically distinguishable subregions, the present study investigated their specific contributions to performance of this task. Rats were trained on the five-choice task prior to receiving excitotoxic lesions or sham surgery. In the first experiment, lesions of the dorsal mPFC (Zilles’s Cg1) resulted in poor accuracy, but no changes in perseverative responding. Introducing variable delays for stimulus presentation abolished these accuracy deficits, suggesting that Cg1-lesioned rats were impaired at using temporal cues to guide performance. In the second experiment, lesions of the ventral mPFC increased perseverative responding, but had only short-lasting effects on accuracy. Rats with complete mPFC lesions had both choice accuracy impairments and increased perseverative responding. Additional evidence of the functional dissociation of dorsal and ventral mPFC came from the analysis of the spatial and temporal distribution of the correct and incorrect responses. Only rats with ventral mPFC lesions showed delay-dependent deficits and bias towards a location that had recently been associated with reward. Taken together, these results suggest dissociable ‘executive’ functions of mPFC subregions. Circuits centred on Cg1 are critical for the temporal organization of behaviour, while networks involving the ventral mPFC are important for maintaining behavioural flexibility.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Ishikawa, F. Ambroggi, S. M. Nicola, and H. L. Fields
Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex Contribution to Behavioral and Nucleus Accumbens Neuronal Responses to Incentive Cues
J. Neurosci., May 7, 2008; 28(19): 5088 - 5098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. A. Winstanley, D. E.H. Theobald, J. W. Dalley, R. N. Cardinal, and T. W. Robbins
Double Dissociation between Serotonergic and Dopaminergic Modulation of Medial Prefrontal and Orbitofrontal Cortex during a Test of Impulsive Choice
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2006; 16(1): 106 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Blasi, V. S. Mattay, A. Bertolino, B. Elvevag, J. H. Callicott, S. Das, B. S. Kolachana, M. F. Egan, T. E. Goldberg, and D. R. Weinberger
Effect of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase val158met Genotype on Attentional Control
J. Neurosci., May 18, 2005; 25(20): 5038 - 5045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K.R. Bailey and R.G. Mair
Dissociable Effects of Frontal Cortical Lesions on Measures of Visuospatial Attention and Spatial Working Memory in the Rat
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2004; 14(9): 974 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. W. Dalley, D. E. Theobald, P. Bouger, Y. Chudasama, R. N. Cardinal, and T. W. Robbins
Cortical Cholinergic Function and Deficits in Visual Attentional Performance in Rats Following 192 IgG-Saporin-induced Lesions of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2004; 14(8): 922 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
Y. Chudasama, J. W. Dalley, F. Nathwani, P. Bouger, and T. W. Robbins
Cholinergic Modulation of Visual Attention and Working Memory: Dissociable Effects of Basal Forebrain 192-IgG-saporin Lesions and Intraprefrontal Infusions of Scopolamine
Learn. Mem., January 1, 2004; 11(1): 78 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Chudasama and T. W. Robbins
Dissociable Contributions of the Orbitofrontal and Infralimbic Cortex to Pavlovian Autoshaping and Discrimination Reversal Learning: Further Evidence for the Functional Heterogeneity of the Rodent Frontal Cortex
J. Neurosci., September 24, 2003; 23(25): 8771 - 8780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. E. Walton, D. M. Bannerman, K. Alterescu, and M. F. S. Rushworth
Functional Specialization within Medial Frontal Cortex of the Anterior Cingulate for Evaluating Effort-Related Decisions
J. Neurosci., July 23, 2003; 23(16): 6475 - 6479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.