Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Petten, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Petten, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 12, No. 11, 1180-1192, November 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Frontal Brain Activity Predicts Individual Performance in an Associative Memory Exclusion Test

Cyma Van Petten, Barbara J. Luka, Susan R. Rubin and John P. Ryan

Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

Address correspondence to Cyma Van Petten, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. Email: vanpettc{at}u.arizona.edu.

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 24 young adults during a recognition test including Old, New, and Recombined pairs composed of two words studied in different pairs. Recombined pairs called for a response of ‘new’. Task difficulty was increased by repetition of some words during the study phase; a subject might study tower/pie, puppet/pie, drill/wreath and bee/wreath (pairs with a Common word), and at test, encounter the Common Recombined pair of puppet/wreath (in addition to Unique Recombined pairs composed of two words studied once). Individual accuracy in the Recombined conditions varied widely, but was unrelated to general memory ability as indexed by accuracy on the Old and New pairs. Posterior brain potentials showed graded amplitudes dependent on the oldness of both the individual words and their combinations (Old > Recombined > New, and Common > Unique), but were also unrelated to accuracy in the Recombined conditions. Amplitudes of ERPs recorded over prefrontal scalp accounted for a large proportion of the individual variability in differentiating studied combinations of words from recombinations of studied elements. The experimental design differentiates three possible roles of prefrontal cortex in source or associative memory tests: resolving a conflict between familiarity and a response of ‘new’, extended memory search, and evaluation of ambiguous memory signals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.