Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, M. G.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, M. G.P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 12, No. 11, 1132-1145, November 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Physiological Responses of New World Monkey V1 Neurons to Stimuli Defined by Coherent Motion

James A. Bourne1,2, Rowan Tweedale2 and Marcello G.P. Rosa1

1 Department of Physiology, Monash University, Victoria 3800 and , 2 Vision, Touch and Hearing Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia

Address correspondence to Dr Marcello Rosa, Department of Physiology, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia. Email: marcello.rosa{at}med.monash.edu.au.

We studied the responses of neurons in area V1 of marmosets to visual stimuli that moved against dynamic textured backgrounds. The stimuli were defined either by a first-order cue (‘solid’ bars, which were either darker or lighter than the background) or by a second-order cue (‘camouflaged’ bars, defined only by coherent motion). Forty-two per cent of the neurons demonstrated a similar selectivity for the direction of motion of the solid and camouflaged bars, thereby characterizing a population of cue-invariant (CI) cells. The other cells either showed different selectivity to the movement of solid and camouflaged bars (non-cue-invariant, or NCI cells), or responded equally well to movement in all directions. CI neurons, which were rare in layer 4, tended to have larger receptive fields and to be more strongly direction selective than NCI cells. Although V1 neurons tended to show maximal responses to camouflaged bars that were longer than the ‘optimal’ solid bars, many CI neurons preferred first- and second-order stimuli of similar lengths. Finally, the activity evoked by the camouflaged bars was delayed in relation to that evoked by solid bars. These results demonstrate that motion CI responses are relatively common in primate V1, especially among a population of strongly direction-selective neurons. They also indicate that this response property may depend on feedback from extrastriate areas, or on complex intrinsic interactions within V1.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. G. Mysore, R. Vogels, S. E. Raiguel, and G. A. Orban
Shape Selectivity for Camouflage-Breaking Dynamic Stimuli in Dorsal V4 Neurons
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 1429 - 1443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Z.-M. Shen, W.-F. Xu, and C.-Y. Li
Cue-invariant detection of centre surround discontinuity by V1 neurons in awake macaque monkey
J. Physiol., September 1, 2007; 583(2): 581 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
L. L. Lui, J. A. Bourne, and M. G.P. Rosa
Functional Response Properties of Neurons in the Dorsomedial Visual Area of New World Monkeys (Callithrix jacchus)
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2006; 16(2): 162 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
Y. Noguchi, Y. Kaneoke, R. Kakigi, H. C. Tanabe, and N. Sadato
Role of the Superior Temporal Region in Human Visual Motion Perception
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1592 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.