Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 11, No. 8, 761-772,
August 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Responses of Neurons in Macaque Area V4 During Memory-guided Visual Search
1 Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), 49 Convent Drive, Building 49, Room 1B80, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415, USA, , 2 Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy, , 3 Center for Learning and Memory, RIKEN-MIT Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA and , 4 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
In a typical scene with many different objects, attentional mechanisms are needed to select relevant objects for visual processing and control over behavior. To test the role of area V4 in the selection of objects based on non-spatial features, we recorded from V4 neurons in the monkey, using a visual search paradigm. A cue stimulus was presented at the center of gaze, followed by a blank delay period. After the delay, a two-stimulus array was presented extrafoveally, and the monkey was rewarded for detecting the target stimulus matching the cue. The array was composed of one ‘good’ stimulus (effective in driving the cell when presented alone) and one ‘poor’ stimulus (ineffective in driving the cell when presented alone). When the choice array was presented in the receptive field (RF) of the neuron, many cells showed suppressive interactions between the stimuli as well as strong attention effects. Within 150–200 ms of array onset, responses to the array were determined by the target stimulus. If the target was the good stimulus, the response to the array became equal to the response to the good stimulus presented alone. If the target was the poor stimulus, the response approached the response to that stimulus presented alone. Thus the influence of the nontarget stimulus was filtered out. These effects were reduced or eliminated when the poor stimulus was located outside the RF and, therefore, no longer competing for the cell's response. Overall, the results support a ‘biased competition’ model of attention, according to which objects in the visual field compete for representation in the cortex, and this competition is biased in favor of the behaviorally relevant object.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. S. Khayat, A. Pooresmaeili, and P. R. Roelfsema Time Course of Attentional Modulation in the Frontal Eye Field During Curve Tracing J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1813 - 1822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Busse, S. Katzner, and S. Treue Temporal dynamics of neuronal modulation during exogenous and endogenous shifts of visual attention in macaque area MT PNAS, October 21, 2008; 105(42): 16380 - 16385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. M. Ghose and J. H. R. Maunsell Spatial Summation Can Explain the Attentional Modulation of Neuronal Responses to Multiple Stimuli in Area V4 J. Neurosci., May 7, 2008; 28(19): 5115 - 5126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. I. Buia and P. H. Tiesinga Role of Interneuron Diversity in the Cortical Microcircuit for Attention J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2158 - 2182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. E. B. Mruczek and D. L. Sheinberg Activity of Inferior Temporal Cortical Neurons Predicts Recognition Choice Behavior and Recognition Time during Visual Search J. Neurosci., March 14, 2007; 27(11): 2825 - 2836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. W. Roach and J. H. Hogben Impaired filtering of behaviourally irrelevant visual information in dyslexia Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 771 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Ledberg, S. L. Bressler, M. Ding, R. Coppola, and R. Nakamura Large-Scale Visuomotor Integration in the Cerebral Cortex Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2007; 17(1): 44 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Geng, E. Eger, C. C. Ruff, A. Kristjansson, P. Rotshtein, and J. Driver On-Line Attentional Selection From Competing Stimuli in Opposite Visual Fields: Effects on Human Visual Cortex and Control Processes J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2601 - 2612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-M. Hopf, S. J. Luck, K. Boelmans, M. A. Schoenfeld, C. N. Boehler, J. Rieger, and H.-J. Heinze The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception. J. Neurosci., March 29, 2006; 26(13): 3532 - 3540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-M. Hopf, C. N. Boehler, S. J. Luck, J. K. Tsotsos, H.-J. Heinze, and M. A. Schoenfeld Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision PNAS, January 24, 2006; 103(4): 1053 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Taylor, S. Mandon, W.A. Freiwald, and A.K. Kreiter Coherent Oscillatory Activity in Monkey Area V4 Predicts Successful Allocation of Attention Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2005; 15(9): 1424 - 1437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. P. Bichot, A. F. Rossi, and R. Desimone Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4 Science, April 22, 2005; 308(5721): 529 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. H. Hamker The Reentry Hypothesis: The Putative Interaction of the Frontal Eye Field, Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex, and Areas V4, IT for Attention and Eye Movement Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2005; 15(4): 431 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-M. Hopf, K. Boelmans, M. A. Schoenfeld, S. J. Luck, and H.-J. Heinze Attention to Features Precedes Attention to Locations in Visual Search: Evidence from Electromagnetic Brain Responses in Humans J. Neurosci., February 25, 2004; 24(8): 1822 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.-I. Tsutsui, M. Jiang, H. Sakata, and M. Taira Short-Term Memory and Perceptual Decision for Three-Dimensional Visual Features in the Caudal Intraparietal Sulcus (Area CIP) J. Neurosci., July 2, 2003; 23(13): 5486 - 5495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. R. Roelfsema, P. S. Khayat, and H. Spekreijse Subtask sequencing in the primary visual cortex PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5467 - 5472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Friedman-Hill, L. C. Robertson, R. Desimone, and L. G. Ungerleider Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 4263 - 4268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|