Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (88)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chelazzi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Desimone, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chelazzi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Desimone, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 11, No. 8, 761-772, August 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Responses of Neurons in Macaque Area V4 During Memory-guided Visual Search

Leonardo Chelazzi1,2, Earl K. Miller1,3, John Duncan1,4 and Robert Desimone1

1 Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), 49 Convent Drive, Building 49, Room 1B80, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415, USA, , 2 Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy, , 3 Center for Learning and Memory, RIKEN-MIT Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA and , 4 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK

In a typical scene with many different objects, attentional mechanisms are needed to select relevant objects for visual processing and control over behavior. To test the role of area V4 in the selection of objects based on non-spatial features, we recorded from V4 neurons in the monkey, using a visual search paradigm. A cue stimulus was presented at the center of gaze, followed by a blank delay period. After the delay, a two-stimulus array was presented extrafoveally, and the monkey was rewarded for detecting the target stimulus matching the cue. The array was composed of one ‘good’ stimulus (effective in driving the cell when presented alone) and one ‘poor’ stimulus (ineffective in driving the cell when presented alone). When the choice array was presented in the receptive field (RF) of the neuron, many cells showed suppressive interactions between the stimuli as well as strong attention effects. Within 150–200 ms of array onset, responses to the array were determined by the target stimulus. If the target was the good stimulus, the response to the array became equal to the response to the good stimulus presented alone. If the target was the poor stimulus, the response approached the response to that stimulus presented alone. Thus the influence of the nontarget stimulus was filtered out. These effects were reduced or eliminated when the poor stimulus was located outside the RF and, therefore, no longer competing for the cell's response. Overall, the results support a ‘biased competition’ model of attention, according to which objects in the visual field compete for representation in the cortex, and this competition is biased in favor of the behaviorally relevant object.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Stokes, R. Thompson, A. C. Nobre, and J. Duncan
Shape-specific preparatory activity mediates attention to targets in human visual cortex
PNAS, November 17, 2009; 106(46): 19569 - 19574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. T. Buracas and T. D. Albright
Modulation of neuronal responses during covert search for visual feature conjunctions
PNAS, September 29, 2009; 106(39): 16853 - 16858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. S. Khayat, A. Pooresmaeili, and P. R. Roelfsema
Time Course of Attentional Modulation in the Frontal Eye Field During Curve Tracing
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1813 - 1822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Busse, S. Katzner, and S. Treue
Temporal dynamics of neuronal modulation during exogenous and endogenous shifts of visual attention in macaque area MT
PNAS, October 21, 2008; 105(42): 16380 - 16385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. M. Ghose and J. H. R. Maunsell
Spatial Summation Can Explain the Attentional Modulation of Neuronal Responses to Multiple Stimuli in Area V4
J. Neurosci., May 7, 2008; 28(19): 5115 - 5126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. I. Buia and P. H. Tiesinga
Role of Interneuron Diversity in the Cortical Microcircuit for Attention
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2158 - 2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. E. B. Mruczek and D. L. Sheinberg
Activity of Inferior Temporal Cortical Neurons Predicts Recognition Choice Behavior and Recognition Time during Visual Search
J. Neurosci., March 14, 2007; 27(11): 2825 - 2836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
N. W. Roach and J. H. Hogben
Impaired filtering of behaviourally irrelevant visual information in dyslexia
Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 771 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Ledberg, S. L. Bressler, M. Ding, R. Coppola, and R. Nakamura
Large-Scale Visuomotor Integration in the Cerebral Cortex
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2007; 17(1): 44 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Geng, E. Eger, C. C. Ruff, A. Kristjansson, P. Rotshtein, and J. Driver
On-Line Attentional Selection From Competing Stimuli in Opposite Visual Fields: Effects on Human Visual Cortex and Control Processes
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2601 - 2612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J.-M. Hopf, S. J. Luck, K. Boelmans, M. A. Schoenfeld, C. N. Boehler, J. Rieger, and H.-J. Heinze
The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception.
J. Neurosci., March 29, 2006; 26(13): 3532 - 3540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-M. Hopf, C. N. Boehler, S. J. Luck, J. K. Tsotsos, H.-J. Heinze, and M. A. Schoenfeld
Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision
PNAS, January 24, 2006; 103(4): 1053 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. Taylor, S. Mandon, W.A. Freiwald, and A.K. Kreiter
Coherent Oscillatory Activity in Monkey Area V4 Predicts Successful Allocation of Attention
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2005; 15(9): 1424 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
N. P. Bichot, A. F. Rossi, and R. Desimone
Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4
Science, April 22, 2005; 308(5721): 529 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
F. H. Hamker
The Reentry Hypothesis: The Putative Interaction of the Frontal Eye Field, Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex, and Areas V4, IT for Attention and Eye Movement
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2005; 15(4): 431 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J.-M. Hopf, K. Boelmans, M. A. Schoenfeld, S. J. Luck, and H.-J. Heinze
Attention to Features Precedes Attention to Locations in Visual Search: Evidence from Electromagnetic Brain Responses in Humans
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2004; 24(8): 1822 - 1832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K.-I. Tsutsui, M. Jiang, H. Sakata, and M. Taira
Short-Term Memory and Perceptual Decision for Three-Dimensional Visual Features in the Caudal Intraparietal Sulcus (Area CIP)
J. Neurosci., July 2, 2003; 23(13): 5486 - 5495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. R. Roelfsema, P. S. Khayat, and H. Spekreijse
Subtask sequencing in the primary visual cortex
PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5467 - 5472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. R. Friedman-Hill, L. C. Robertson, R. Desimone, and L. G. Ungerleider
Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors
PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 4263 - 4268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.