Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lidow, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Song, Z.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lidow, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Song, Z.-M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 11, No. 6, 545-551, June 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Effect of Cocaine on Cell Proliferation in the Cerebral Wall of Monkey Fetuses

Michael S. Lidow and Zan-Min Song

Department of Oral and Craniofacial Biological Sciences and Program of Neuroscience, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

This study examined the effect of cocaine on cell proliferation in the fetal monkey cerebral wall. Pregnant monkeys received cocaine daily (10 mg/kg, orally, in fruit treats, at 07.00 h and 19.00 h) beginning on the 40th day of pregnancy (E40). The control animals received fruit treats only. One set of monkeys was used to examine the state of cell proliferation in the fetal cerebral wall at peak cocaine levels. These animals were injected with [3H]thymidine intravenously on E73, 1.5 h after the morning drug or placebo administration. Another set of monkeys was used to determine the state of cell proliferation after cocaine concentration declined to ineffective levels. These animals were injected with [3H]thymidine on the same day of pregnancy 10 h after the treatment. Cesarean sections were performed 40 min after the radioisotope injection. The right hemispheres were processed for autoradiography. The left hemispheres were used for biochemical analysis of the radioisotope incorporation into DNA. The third set of monkeys was used to determine whether chronic cocaine treatment extends the timing of neocortical neuronogenesis. These monkeys received their final cocaine treatment on E102 (the last day of normal neocortical neuronogenesis) and were injected with [3H]thymidine 24 h later. On E113, the fetal brains were processed for emulsion autoradiography. We found a significant decrease in the density of [3H]thymidine-labeled cells and in the levels of this radioisotope incorporation into DNA in the fetal cerebral wall 1.5 h after cocaine administration. In contrast, 10 h after cocaine administration we detected a significantly elevated density of radiolabeled cells, and abnormally high levels of [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA. This suggests that chronic intermittent administration of cocaine results in significant periodic fluctuations in cell production within the fetal cortical proliferative zones. We detected no cocaine-induced extension in neocortical neuronogenesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. E. Crandall, H. E. Hackett, S. A. Tobet, B. E. Kosofsky, and P. G. Bhide
Cocaine Exposure Decreases GABA Neuron Migration from the Ganglionic Eminence to the Cerebral Cortex in Embryonic Mice
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2004; 14(6): 665 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. Ohtani, T. Goto, C. Waeber, and P. G. Bhide
Dopamine Modulates Cell Cycle in the Lateral Ganglionic Eminence
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 2840 - 2850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.