Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (53)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A.T.
Right arrow Articles by Greenlee, M.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A.T.
Right arrow Articles by Greenlee, M.W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 11, No. 12, 1182-1190, December 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Estimating Receptive Field Size from fMRI Data in Human Striate and Extrastriate Visual Cortex

A.T. Smith, K.D. Singh1, A.L. Williams and M.W. Greenlee2,3

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UK and, 1 Current address: Neurosciences Research Institute, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK, 2 Neurologische Universitätsklinik, Breisacherstrasse 64, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany, 3 Current address: Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, University of Oldenburg, Ammerlaender Heerstrasse 144, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany

Andy Smith, Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UK. Email: a.t.smith{at}rhul.ac.uk

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to estimate the average receptive field sizes of neurons in each of several striate and extrastriate visual areas of the human cerebral cortex. The boundaries of the visual areas were determined by retinotopic mapping procedures and were visualized on flattened representations of the occipital cortex. Estimates of receptive field size were derived from the temporal duration of the functional activation at each cortical location as a visual stimulus passed through the receptive fields represented at that location. Receptive fields are smallest in the primary visual cortex (V1). They are larger in V2, larger again in V3/VP and largest of all in areas V3A and V4. In all these areas, receptive fields increase in size with increasing stimulus eccentricity. The results are qualitatively in line with those obtained by others in macaque monkeys using neurophysiological methods.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
D. Ansari, I. M. Lyons, L. van Eimeren, and F. Xu
Linking Visual Attention and Number Processing in the Brain: The Role of the Temporo-parietal Junction in Small and Large Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Number Comparison.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2007; 19(11): 1845 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. Yoshor, W. H. Bosking, G. M. Ghose, and J. H. R. Maunsell
Receptive Fields in Human Visual Cortex Mapped with Surface Electrodes
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 2293 - 2302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. Maertens and S. Pollmann
Illusory Contours Do Not Pass through the "Blind Spot".
J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2007; 19(1): 91 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Neri and D. M. Levi
Temporal Dynamics of Figure-Ground Segregation in Human Vision
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 951 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Larsson and D. J. Heeger
Two Retinotopic Visual Areas in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex
J. Neurosci., December 20, 2006; 26(51): 13128 - 13142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. V. Liu, H. Ashida, A. T. Smith, and B. A. Wandell
Assessment of Stimulus-Induced Changes in Human V1 Visual Field Maps
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3398 - 3408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Geng, E. Eger, C. C. Ruff, A. Kristjansson, P. Rotshtein, and J. Driver
On-Line Attentional Selection From Competing Stimuli in Opposite Visual Fields: Effects on Human Visual Cortex and Control Processes
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2601 - 2612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
J. D. Mendola, I. P. Conner, S. Sharma, A. Bahekar, and S. Lemieux
fMRI Measures of Perceptual Filling-in in the Human Visual Cortex.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 18(3): 363 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-D. Haynes, J. Tregellas, and G. Rees
Attentional integration between anatomically distinct stimulus representations in early visual cortex
PNAS, October 11, 2005; 102(41): 14925 - 14930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. M. McKendrick, D. R. Badcock, and W. H. Morgan
The Detection of both Global Motion and Global Form Is Disrupted in Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3693 - 3701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. W. Self and S. Zeki
The Integration of Colour and Motion by the Human Visual Brain
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1270 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. O. S. Goh, S. C. Siong, D. Park, A. Gutchess, A. Hebrank, and M. W. L. Chee
Cortical Areas Involved in Object, Background, and Object-Background Processing Revealed with Functional Magnetic Resonance Adaptation
J. Neurosci., November 10, 2004; 24(45): 10223 - 10228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. M. Schira, M. Fahle, T. H. Donner, A. Kraft, and S. A. Brandt
Differential Contribution of Early Visual Areas to the Perceptual Process of Contour Processing
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1716 - 1721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Graboi and J. Lisman
Recognition by Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processing in Cortex: The Control of Selective Attention
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2003; 90(2): 798 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Zenger-Landolt and D. J. Heeger
Response Suppression in V1 Agrees with Psychophysics of Surround Masking
J. Neurosci., July 30, 2003; 23(17): 6884 - 6893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Pessoa, S. Kastner, and L. G. Ungerleider
Neuroimaging Studies of Attention: From Modulation of Sensory Processing to Top-Down Control
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2003; 23(10): 3990 - 3998.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.