Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 11, No. 10, 954-965,
October 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
New Evidence for Distinct Right and Left Brain Systems for Deductive versus Probabilistic Reasoning
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX and , 1 Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Lawrence M. Parsons, Director, Cognitive Neuroscience Program, Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, USA.
Deductive and probabilistic reasoning are central to cognition but the functional neuroanatomy underlying them is poorly understood. The present study contrasted these two kinds of reasoning via positron emission tomography. Relying on changes in instruction and psychological ‘set’, deductive versus probabilistic reasoning was induced using identical stimuli. The stimuli were arguments in propositional calculus not readily solved via mental diagrams. Probabilistic reasoning activated mostly left brain areas whereas deductive activated mostly right. Deduction activated areas near right brain homologues of left language areas in middle temporal lobe, inferior frontal cortex and basal ganglia, as well as right amygdala, but not spatial–visual areas. Right hemisphere activations in the deduction task cannot be explained by spill-over from overtaxed, left language areas. Probabilistic reasoning was mostly associated with left hemispheric areas in inferior frontal, posterior cingulate, parahippocampal, medial temporal, and superior and medial prefrontal cortices. The foregoing regions are implicated in recalling and evaluating a range of world knowledge, operations required during probabilistic thought. The findings confirm that deduction and induction are distinct processes, consistent with psychological theories enforcing their partial separation. The results also suggest that, except for statement decoding, deduction is largely independent of language, and that some forms of logical thinking are non-diagrammatic.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. D. LEE Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models Psychon Bull Rev, February 1, 2008; 15(1): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Papo, A. Douiri, F. Bouchet, J.-C. Bourzeix, J.-P. Caverni, and P.-M. Baudonniere Time-Frequency Intracranial Source Localization of Feedback-Related EEG Activity in Hypothesis Testing Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1314 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. M. Goghari, K. Rehm, C. S. Carter, and A. W. MacDonald III Regionally Specific Cortical Thinning and Gray Matter Abnormalities in the Healthy Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 415 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Goel, J. Shuren, L. Sheesley, and J. Grafman Asymmetrical involvement of frontal lobes in social reasoning Brain, April 1, 2004; 127(4): 783 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|