Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (92)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gevins, A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gevins, A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 10, No. 9, 829-839, September 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Neurophysiological Measures of Working Memory and Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability and Cognitive Style

Alan Gevins and Michael E. Smith

San Francisco Brain Research Institute & SAM Technology, 425 Bush Street – Fifth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108-3708, USA

The capacity to deliberately control attention in order to hold and manipulate information in working memory is critical to higher cognitive functions. This suggests that between-subject differences in general cognitive ability might be related to observable differences in the activity of brain systems that support working memory and attention control. To test this notion, electroencephalograms were recorded from 80 healthy young adults during spatial working memory tasks. Measures of task-related neurophysiological and behavioral variables were derived from these data and compared to scores on a test battery commonly used to assess general cognitive ability (the WAIS-R). Subjects who scored high on the psychometric test also tended to respond faster in the experimental tasks without any loss of accuracy. The amplitude of the late positive component of the event-related potential was larger in high-ability subjects, and the frontal midline theta component of the EEG signal was also selectively enhanced in this group under conditions of sustained performance and high working memory load. These results suggest that subjects who scored high on the WAIS-R were better able to focus and sustain attention to task performance. Changes in the EEG alpha rhythm in response to manipulations of task practice and load were also examined and compared between frontal and parietal regions. The results indicated that high-ability subjects developed strategies that made relatively greater use of parietal regions, whereas low-ability subjects relied more exclusively on frontal regions. Other analyses indicated that hemispheric asymmetries in alpha band measures distinguish between individuals with relatively high verbal aptitude and those with relatively high nonverbal aptitude. In particular, subjects with a verbal cognitive style tended to make greater use of the left parietal region during task performance, and subjects with a nonverbal style tended to make greater use of the right parietal region. These results help clarify relationships between task-related brain activity and individual differences in cognitive ability and style.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. J. Meador, A. Gevins, D. W. Loring, L. K. McEvoy, P. G. Ray, M. E. Smith, G. K. Motamedi, B. M. Evans, and C. Baum
Neuropsychological and neurophysiologic effects of carbamazepine and levetiracetam
Neurology, November 27, 2007; 69(22): 2076 - 2084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
C. Summerfield and J. A. Mangels
Dissociable neural mechanisms for encoding predictable and unpredictable events.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2006; 18(7): 1120 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Tsujimoto, H. Shimazu, and Y. Isomura
Direct Recording of Theta Oscillations in Primate Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortices
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2987 - 3000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
W. Klimesch, S. Hanslmayr, P. Sauseng, W. Gruber, C.J. Brozinsky, N.E.A. Kroll, A.P. Yonelinas, and M. Doppelmayr
Oscillatory EEG Correlates of Episodic Trace Decay
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2006; 16(2): 280 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
M. Pomplun and M. Custer
The Construct Validity of the Stanford-Binet 5 Measures of Working Memory
Assessment, September 1, 2005; 12(3): 338 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
F. Hummel and C. Gerloff
Larger Interregional Synchrony is Associated with Greater Behavioral Success in a Complex Sensory Integration Task in Humans
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2005; 15(5): 670 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. F. Glabus, B. Horwitz, J. L. Holt, P. D. Kohn, B. K. Gerton, J. H. Callicott, A. Meyer-Lindenberg, and K. F. Berman
Interindividual Differences in Functional Interactions among Prefrontal, Parietal and Parahippocampal Regions during Working Memory
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2003; 13(12): 1352 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.